Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section

被引:21
|
作者
Fisler, RE
Cohen, A
Ringer, SA
Lieberman, E
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Joint Program Neonatol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2003年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME; VAGINAL BIRTH; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; INTRAPARTUM FEVER; MATERNAL FEVER; TERM INFANTS; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN; PLASMA;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00225.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Trial of labor after cesarean section has been an important strategy for lowering the rate of cesarean delivery in the United States, but concerns regarding its safety remain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of newborns delivered by elective repeat cesarean section compared to delivery following a trial of labor after cesarean. Methods: All low-risk mothers with 1 or 2 previous cesareans and no prior vaginal deliveries, who delivered at our institution from December 1994 through July 1995, were identified. Neonatal outcomes were compared between 136 women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section and 313 women who delivered after a trial of labor. To investigate reasons for differences in outcome between these groups, neonatal outcomes within the trial of labor group were then compared between those mothers who had received epidural analgesia (n = 230) and those who did not (n = 83). Results: Infants delivered after a trial of labor had increased rates of sepsis evaluation (23.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.008); antibiotic treatment (11.5% vs 4.4%, p = 0.02); intubation to evaluate for the presence of meconium below the cords (11.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001); and mild bruising (8.0% vs 1.5%, p = 0.008). Within the trial of labor group, infants of mothers who received epidural analgesia were more likely to have received diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions including sepsis evaluation (29.6% vs 6.0%, p = 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (13.9% vs 4.8%, p = 0.03) than within the no-epidural analgesia group. Conclusions: Infants born to mothers after a trial of labor are twice as likely to undergo diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions than infants born after an elective repeat cesarean section, but the increase occurred only in the subgroup of infants whose mothers received epidural analgesia for pain relief during labor. The higher rate of intervention could relate to the well-documented increase in intrapartum fever that occurs with epidural use.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 88
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neonatal respiratory morbidity after elective cesarean section
    Many, A
    Helpman, L
    Vilnai, Y
    Kupferminc, MJ
    Lessing, JB
    Dollberg, S
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (02): : 75 - 78
  • [32] Elective cesarean section: Its impact on neonatal respiratory outcome
    Ramachandrappa, Ashwin
    Jain, Lucky
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2008, 35 (02) : 373 - +
  • [33] Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Grobman, William A.
    Bryant, Allison S.
    Norrell, Laura
    Bermingham, Yamilee
    Altshuler, Anna
    Thiet, Mari-Paule
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Bacchetti, Peter
    Moghadassi, Michelle
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (08) : 1143 - 1152
  • [34] Trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean: what do good TOLAC candidates do?
    Bruno, Ann M.
    Woolfolk, Candice
    Wan, Leping
    Stout, Molly J.
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S440 - S440
  • [35] Trial of Labor After Two Cesarean Sections Versus Repeat Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Horgan, Rebecca
    Hossain, Saif
    Fulginiti, Adriana
    Massaro, Robert
    Graebe, Robert
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 177S - 177S
  • [36] Trial of labor after cesarean section in twin pregnancies: Maternal and neonatal safety
    Aaronson, Daniel
    Harlev, Avi
    Sheiner, Eyal
    Levy, Amalia
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (06): : 550 - 554
  • [37] PREVENTION OF IATROGENIC NEONATAL RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME - ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN-SECTION AND SPONTANEOUS LABOR
    BOWERS, SK
    MACDONALD, HM
    SHAPIRO, ED
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 143 (02) : 186 - 189
  • [38] Women's preferences regarding the processes and outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Grobman, William A.
    Bryant, Allison
    Norrell, Laura
    Bermingham, Yamilee
    Atshuler, Anna
    Thiet, Mari-Paule
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Bacchetti, Peter
    Moghadassi, Michelle
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S516 - S516
  • [39] ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN-SECTION
    PORRECO, RP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1981, 139 (05) : 613 - 613
  • [40] Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Vukcevic, G.
    Kljakic, D.
    Popivoda, Z.
    Grdinic, A.
    Marijanovic, G.
    Raicevic, S.
    ADVANCES IN PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, : 675 - +