Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section

被引:21
|
作者
Fisler, RE
Cohen, A
Ringer, SA
Lieberman, E
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Joint Program Neonatol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2003年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME; VAGINAL BIRTH; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; INTRAPARTUM FEVER; MATERNAL FEVER; TERM INFANTS; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN; PLASMA;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00225.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Trial of labor after cesarean section has been an important strategy for lowering the rate of cesarean delivery in the United States, but concerns regarding its safety remain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of newborns delivered by elective repeat cesarean section compared to delivery following a trial of labor after cesarean. Methods: All low-risk mothers with 1 or 2 previous cesareans and no prior vaginal deliveries, who delivered at our institution from December 1994 through July 1995, were identified. Neonatal outcomes were compared between 136 women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section and 313 women who delivered after a trial of labor. To investigate reasons for differences in outcome between these groups, neonatal outcomes within the trial of labor group were then compared between those mothers who had received epidural analgesia (n = 230) and those who did not (n = 83). Results: Infants delivered after a trial of labor had increased rates of sepsis evaluation (23.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.008); antibiotic treatment (11.5% vs 4.4%, p = 0.02); intubation to evaluate for the presence of meconium below the cords (11.5% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001); and mild bruising (8.0% vs 1.5%, p = 0.008). Within the trial of labor group, infants of mothers who received epidural analgesia were more likely to have received diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions including sepsis evaluation (29.6% vs 6.0%, p = 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (13.9% vs 4.8%, p = 0.03) than within the no-epidural analgesia group. Conclusions: Infants born to mothers after a trial of labor are twice as likely to undergo diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions than infants born after an elective repeat cesarean section, but the increase occurred only in the subgroup of infants whose mothers received epidural analgesia for pain relief during labor. The higher rate of intervention could relate to the well-documented increase in intrapartum fever that occurs with epidural use.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 88
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving Neonatal and Maternal Outcome by Inducing Mild Labor before Elective Cesarean Section: The Lacarus Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wellmann, Sven
    Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin
    Fischer, Tina
    Schaeffer, Leonhard
    Gaertner, Vincent D.
    Malfertheiner, Sara Fill
    Burkhardt, Tilo
    NEONATOLOGY, 2021, 118 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [22] Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section
    McMahon, MJ
    Luther, ER
    Bowes, WA
    Olshan, AF
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (10): : 689 - 695
  • [23] The MFMU Cesarean Registry: cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor compared with an elective repeat cesarean delivery after a previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S303 - S303
  • [24] The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Mi, Mei-yan
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (07) : E37156
  • [25] Neonatal outcome after cesarean section
    Katarzyna, Kornacka Maria
    Kufel, Katarzyna
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 82 (08) : 612 - 617
  • [26] Trial of labor after previous cesarean section versus repeat cesarean section: are patients making an informed decision?
    Bernstein, Sarah
    Matalon-Grazi, Shira
    Rosenn, Barak
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S21 - S21
  • [27] Trial of labor after cesarean section
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2001, 101 (10) : 20 - 20
  • [28] Trial of labor after cesarean section
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Yang, Szu-Ting
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (05): : 739 - 740
  • [29] Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery
    Studsgaard, Anne
    Skorstengaard, Malene
    Glavind, Julie
    Hvidman, Lone
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (11) : 1256 - 1263
  • [30] TRIAL OF LABOR AFTER PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION - OBSTETRIC OUTCOME
    CHUA, S
    ARULKUMARAN, S
    SINGH, P
    RATNAM, SS
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 29 (01): : 12 - 17