Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Posiewnik, Michal [1 ]
Piotrowski, Tomasz [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Gdynia Oncol Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Gdynia, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Dept Electroradiol, 15 Garbary St, PL-61866 Poznan, Poland
[3] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Poznan, Poland
来源
WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
MR-only planning; prostate cancer; fiducial registration error; synthetic CT; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE CALCULATIONS; CT; WORKFLOW;
D O I
10.5114/wo.2021.112518
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging. Material and methods: We used CT and MR images of ten prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) in the prostate gland. Rigid registration based on FM was performed to assess the fusion accuracy between MR and CT images. The differences between prostate contours (clinical target volume - CTV) on CT (CTV CT) and MR (CTV MR) images were scored using the Dice similarity coefficient and directly comparing the outlined volumes. The volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed and optimised on synthetic CT (sCT) to obtain the dose distribution for the MR-only solution. In the next step, the sCT images were replaced by conventional CT images and the plans were recalculated. The doses obtained on sCT and CT were compared by direct dose subtraction and the gamma method. Results: The averaged fiducial registration error was equal to 0.5 mm. All CTV CT volumes were significantly bigger than corresponding CTV delineated on MR images (p = 0.005). The direct dose comparison shows that for 97.1% of patients' bodies, the differences were smaller than 0.1%. The average gamma passing rates were higher than 0.970. Conclusions: MR imaging allows for a more precise delineation of the prostate compared to CT imaging. The workflow of plan preparation based on MR and CT is burdened with an FM registration error that is eliminated by an MR-only solution with no compromise on dose distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 245
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MRI-only radiotherapy from an economic perspective: Can new techniques in prostate cancer treatment be cost saving?
    Persson, Emilia
    Svanberg, Niklas
    Scherman, Jonas
    Gustafsson, Christian Jamtheim
    Fridhammar, Adam
    Hjalte, Frida
    Back, Sven
    Nilsson, Per
    Gunnlaugsson, Adalsteinn
    Olsson, Lars E.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 183 - 187
  • [42] Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation for MR-only radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with 0.35T MRI linear accelerator
    Farjam, Reza
    Nagar, Himanshu
    Kathy Zhou, Xi
    Ouellette, David
    Chiara Formenti, Silvia
    DeWyngaert, J. Keith
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (08): : 93 - 104
  • [43] Dosimetric effects of oral contrast in the planning of conventional radiotherapy and IMRT, for rectal cancer treatment
    Montero-Oleas, Nadia
    Imbaquingo-Cabrera, Andres
    Coloma-Espin, Alejandro
    Collantes-Cruz, Vladimir
    Molineros, Carlos
    Nunez-Silva, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 22
  • [44] Novel dosimetric validation of a commercial CT scanner based deep learning automated contour solution for prostate radiotherapy
    Berenato, Salvatore
    Williams, Matthew
    Woodley, Owain
    Moehler, Christian
    Evans, Elin
    Millin, Anthony E.
    Wheeler, Philip A.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 122
  • [45] Evaluation of dosimetric uncertainty caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning
    Han, Silu
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Cai, Jing
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (02): : 43 - 50
  • [46] Development and clinical introduction of automated radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Winkel, D.
    Bol, G. H.
    van Asselen, B.
    Hes, J.
    Scholten, V.
    Kerkmeijer, L. G. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (24): : 8587 - 8595
  • [47] Dosimetric benefit of online treatment plan adaptation in stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Fink, Christoph A.
    Buchele, Carolin
    Baumann, Lukas
    Liermann, Jakob
    Hoegen, Philipp
    Ristau, Jonas
    Regnery, Sebastian
    Sandrini, Elisabetta
    Koenig, Laila
    Rippke, Carolin
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Debus, Juergen
    Koerber, Stefan A.
    Klueter, Sebastian
    Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [48] MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact
    Pappas, Eleftherios P.
    Alshanqity, Mukhtar
    Moutsatsos, Argyris
    Lababidi, Hani
    Alsafi, Khalid
    Georgiou, Konstantinos
    Karaiskos, Pantelis
    Georgiou, Evangelos
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (06) : 1120 - 1129
  • [49] Magnetic Resonance Imaging only Workflow for Radiotherapy Simulation and Planning in Prostate Cancer
    Kerkmeijer, L. G. W.
    Maspero, M.
    Meijer, G. J.
    van Zyp, J. R. N. van der Voort
    de Boer, C. J.
    van den Berg, C. A. T.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 30 (11) : 692 - 701
  • [50] Comparison of the Dose Distribution Obtained from Dosimetric Systems with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Planning System in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Gokce, M.
    Uslu, D. Kocyigit
    Ertunc, C.
    Karali, T.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CONFERENCE OF THE BALKAN PHYSICAL UNION (BPU-9), 2016, 1722