Validation of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer radiotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Posiewnik, Michal [1 ]
Piotrowski, Tomasz [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Gdynia Oncol Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Gdynia, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Dept Electroradiol, 15 Garbary St, PL-61866 Poznan, Poland
[3] Greater Poland Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Poznan, Poland
来源
WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
MR-only planning; prostate cancer; fiducial registration error; synthetic CT; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSE CALCULATIONS; CT; WORKFLOW;
D O I
10.5114/wo.2021.112518
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim was to validate the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of radiotherapy treatment plans for prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging only and a solution based on computed tomography (CT) supported by MR imaging. Material and methods: We used CT and MR images of ten prostate cancer patients implanted with three fiducial markers (FM) in the prostate gland. Rigid registration based on FM was performed to assess the fusion accuracy between MR and CT images. The differences between prostate contours (clinical target volume - CTV) on CT (CTV CT) and MR (CTV MR) images were scored using the Dice similarity coefficient and directly comparing the outlined volumes. The volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were designed and optimised on synthetic CT (sCT) to obtain the dose distribution for the MR-only solution. In the next step, the sCT images were replaced by conventional CT images and the plans were recalculated. The doses obtained on sCT and CT were compared by direct dose subtraction and the gamma method. Results: The averaged fiducial registration error was equal to 0.5 mm. All CTV CT volumes were significantly bigger than corresponding CTV delineated on MR images (p = 0.005). The direct dose comparison shows that for 97.1% of patients' bodies, the differences were smaller than 0.1%. The average gamma passing rates were higher than 0.970. Conclusions: MR imaging allows for a more precise delineation of the prostate compared to CT imaging. The workflow of plan preparation based on MR and CT is burdened with an FM registration error that is eliminated by an MR-only solution with no compromise on dose distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 245
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the dosimetric accuracy of MR-only treatment planning solution for prostate cancer
    Tejedor, Natalia
    Jornet, Nuria
    Gallego, Pedro
    Sancho, Gemma
    Soto-Cambres, Ana Maria
    Mera, Arantxa
    Perez-Alija, Jaime
    Anson, Cristina
    Vivancos, Helena
    Ruiz, Agustin
    Barcelo, Marta
    Leo, Fatima
    Dominguez, Alejandro
    Riu, Victor
    Carrasco, Pablo
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3951 - S3954
  • [2] Clinical workflow for MR-only simulation and planning in prostate
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Fontenla, Sandra
    Zelefsky, Michael
    Chong-Ton, Marcia
    Ostergren, Kyle
    Shah, Niral
    Warner, Lizette
    Kadbi, Mo
    Mechalakos, Jim
    Hunt, Margie
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12
  • [3] The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy
    Jonsson, Joakim
    Nyholm, Tufve
    Soderkvist, Karin
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 18 : 60 - 65
  • [4] Geometric and dosimetric impact of anatomical changes for MR-only radiation therapy for the prostate
    Nejad-Davarani, Siamak P.
    Sevak, Parag
    Moncion, Michael
    Garbarino, Kimberly
    Weiss, Steffen
    Kim, Joshua
    Schultz, Lonni
    Elshaikh, Mohamed A.
    Renisch, Steffen
    Glide-Hurst, Carri
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (04): : 10 - 17
  • [5] CycleSeg: Simultaneous synthetic CT generation and unsupervised segmentation for MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer
    Luu, Huan Minh
    Yoo, Gyu Sang
    Park, Won
    Park, Sung-Hong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (06) : 4365 - 4379
  • [6] Clinical workflow for MR-only simulation and planning in prostate
    Neelam Tyagi
    Sandra Fontenla
    Michael Zelefsky
    Marcia Chong-Ton
    Kyle Ostergren
    Niral Shah
    Lizette Warner
    Mo Kadbi
    Jim Mechalakos
    Margie Hunt
    Radiation Oncology, 12
  • [7] Dosimetric Evaluation of Dose Calculation Uncertainties for MR-Only Approaches in Prostate MR-Guided Radiotherapy
    Coric, Ivan
    Shreshtha, Kumar
    Roque, Thais
    Paragios, Nikos
    Gani, Cihan
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    Nachbar, Marcel
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 10
  • [8] Does dose calculation algorithm affect the dosimetric accuracy of synthetic CT for MR-only radiotherapy planning in brain tumors?
    Lui, Jeffrey C. F.
    Lee, Francis K. H.
    Law, C. C.
    Chow, James C. H.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [9] Accuracy of an MR-only workflow for prostate radiotherapy using semi-automatically burned-in fiducial markers
    Goudschaal, Karin
    Beeksma, F.
    Boon, M.
    Bijveld, M.
    Visser, J.
    Hinnen, K.
    van Kesteren, Z.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [10] A combined automatic MR OAR contouring and synthetic CT solution for prostate MR-only radiotherapy
    Wyatt, Jonathan J.
    Kaushik, Sandeep
    Cozzini, Cristina
    Kolozsvari, Bernadett
    Deak-Karancsi, Borbala
    Pearson, Rachel A.
    Petit, Steven
    Capala, Marta
    Hernandez-Tamames, Juan A.
    Hideghety, Katalin
    Maxwell, Ross J.
    Rusko, Laszlo
    Wiesinger, Florian
    McCallum, Hazel M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3144 - S3147