Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?

被引:5
作者
Kim, Hwiwoo [1 ]
Pak, Sahyun [2 ]
Park, Kye Jin [3 ]
Kim, Mi-hyun [3 ]
Kim, Jeong Kon [3 ]
Kim, Myong [4 ]
You, Dalsan [1 ]
Jeong, In Gab [1 ]
Song, Cheryn [1 ]
Hong, Jun Hyuk [1 ]
Kim, Choung-Soo [1 ]
Ahn, Hanjong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Coll Med, 88 Olymp Ro, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Ctr Urol Canc, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Seongnam, South Korea
关键词
Active surveillance; Magnetic resonance imaging; PI-RADS; Prostate cancer; Unfavorable disease; SCORE; ACCURACY; BIOPSY; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2019.09.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We investigated the utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) in patients with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance. We found that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with PI-RADSv2 has high negative predictive value in active surveillance candidates. Moreover, multiple PI-RADS 4-5 lesions were associated with unfavorable disease compared with solitary lesions, and multiple PI-RADS 5 lesions were strongly associated with Gleason score >= 4 + 3 or pathologic stage T3 disease. Background: We investigated the utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2), scoring in patients with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance (AS). Materials and Methods: The medical records of the patients who had undergone mpMRI before radical prostatectomy from 2014 to 2018 were reviewed. All the patients had met the Prostate Cancer Research International AS criteria. PI-RADSv2 scores were assigned to 12 prostate regions. Unfavorable disease was stratified using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) prognostic scale as stage IIB (Gleason score [GS], 3 4 and pathologic stage T2) and IIC-III(GS, >= 4+3 or pathologic stage T3). Results: Of 376 eligible patients, 184 (48.9%), 129 (34.3%), and 63 (16.8%) had AJCC stage I, IIB, and IIC-III disease, respectively. The patients with IIC-III disease were older and had a higher prostate-specific antigen density than those with stagelor IIB disease. PI-RADS 5 lesions were more frequent in patients with stage IIC-III than in patients with stage I or IIB disease. Multivariable analysis revealed that >= 2 lesions with a PI-RADS 5 score was an independent predictor for unfavorable disease (hazard ratio [HR], 3.612; P < .001 for IIB; HR, 6.562; P < .001 for IIC-III), and PI-RADS score of >= 4 was limited for predicting AJCC stage IIB disease (HR 2.387; P = .01). Conclusion: mpMRI with PI-RADSv2 showed high negative predictive value for patients with prostate cancer eligible for AS. Multiple PI-RADS 4-5 lesions were associated with unfavorable disease compared with solitary lesions. Multiple PI-RADS 5 lesions were strongly associated with GS >= 4+3 or pathologic T3 disease. Targeted biopsy or radical treatment should be considered for these patients. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 55
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [2] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [3] Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Chiu, Peter K.
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Albers, Peter
    Arsov, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) : 310 - 318
  • [4] Role of Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Image and PIRADS Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance According PRIAS Criteria
    Almeida, Gilberto Laurino
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Ferro, Matteo
    Ribas, Carmen Australia Paredes Marcondes
    Detti, Serena
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Matei, Deliu Victor
    Coman, Ioan
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (04) : 459 - 469
  • [5] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [6] Use and early mortality outcomes of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Butler, Santino S.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Lamba, Nayan
    Mossanen, Matthew
    Martin, Neil E.
    Mouw, Kent W.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    [J]. CANCER, 2019, 125 (18) : 3164 - 3171
  • [7] Prostate Cancer - Major Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Cancer Staging Manual
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Sartor, Oliver
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (03) : 246 - 253
  • [8] The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer
    Chen, Cheng
    Chen, Ye
    Hu, Lin-Kun
    Jiang, Chang-Chuan
    Xu, Ren-Fang
    He, Xiao-Zhou
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2018, 20 (04) : 366 - 371
  • [9] Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Stauf, Frank
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Perez, Nanette
    Master, Viraj A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (12) : 2664 - 2670
  • [10] Association between percentage of tumor involvement and Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer
    Fu, Qiang
    Moul, Judd W.
    Banez, Lionel L.
    Sun, Leon
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Xie, Dongha
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    [J]. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 29 (05) : 3339 - 3344