Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial

被引:3
作者
Kim, Mi-Hyun [1 ]
Hwang, Jung-Won [2 ]
Kim, Eun-Sung [1 ]
Han, Sung-Hee [2 ]
Jeon, Young-Tae [2 ]
Lee, Sun-Mi [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Songnam, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Laryngeal mask airway; Airway management; General anesthesia; Non-paralyzed patients; ADULT PATIENTS; ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE; APPROPRIATE SIZE; SELECTION; ANESTHESIA; CROSSOVER; INSERTION; PRESSURE; STANDARD;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-014-1916-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Based on experimental results, various authors have advocated a size 4 ProSeal (TM) laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in preference to a size 3 PLMA for women given a neuromuscular blocking agent because the larger size provided a better airway seal. However, spontaneously breathing patients may be ventilated adequately with a lower seal pressure than that needed for mechanical ventilation. Therefore, a smaller size might be preferable as its reduced bulk possibly induces less mucosal damage in non-paralyzed patients. A total of 152 females undergoing general anesthesia for short outpatient gynecological surgeries were randomly allocated in equal numbers to insertion of a size 3 or 4 PLMA. The insertion time, success rate, seal pressure, hemodynamic variables, and complications, such as blood staining and sore throat, were evaluated. The incidence of blood staining was lower with the size 3 PLMA compared to the size 4 PLMA (18 vs. 36 %; P = 0.028). Compared with the size 3 LMA, the size 4 PLMA resulted in higher fluctuations in both blood pressure (P = 0.003) and heart rate (P = 0.01). The insertion time was shorter with the size 3 PLMA (9 vs. 16 s; P < 0.001). The airway seal pressure with the size 3 PLMA, although lower than that of the size 4 PLMA (23 vs. 28 cmH(2)O; P = 0.001), was sufficient for spontaneous ventilation. Due to the reduced incidence of mucosal injury and greater hemodynamic stability, the size 3 PLMA may be preferable to the size 4 PLMA for non-paralyzed females.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 262
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Cuff volume and size selection with the laryngeal mask
    Asai, T
    Brimacombe, J
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (12) : 1179 - 1184
  • [2] Appropriate size and inflation of the laryngeal mask airway
    Asai, T
    Howell, TK
    Koga, K
    Morris, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (04) : 470 - 474
  • [3] 'Re-evaluation of appropriate size of the laryngeal mask airway
    Asai, T
    Murao, K
    Yukawa, H
    Shingu, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (03) : 478 - 479
  • [4] A comparison of the proseal laryngeal mask airway™, the laryngeal tube S®o and the oesophageal-tracheal combitube™ during routine surgical procedures
    Bein, B
    Carstensen, S
    Gleim, M
    Claus, L
    Tonner, PH
    Steinfath, M
    Scholz, J
    Dörges, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 22 (05) : 341 - 346
  • [5] Benumof JL, 1998, ANESTH ANALG, V87, P977
  • [6] The LMA 'ProSeal' - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent
    Brain, AIJ
    Verghese, C
    Strube, PJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (05) : 650 - 654
  • [7] The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway - A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [8] Gum elastic Bongie-guided insetfion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Judd, DV
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [9] A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Fullekrug, B
    Agrò, F
    Rosenblatt, W
    Dierdorf, SF
    de Lucas, EG
    Capdevilla, X
    Brimacombe, N
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (02) : 289 - 295
  • [10] Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    Kurian, S
    Myles, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (01) : 127 - 129