Bias in criminological research

被引:0
作者
Fielding, N
机构
[1] University of Surrey, Guildford
来源
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY | 1996年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
scientific bias; criminological controversies; research methods;
D O I
10.1080/09585189608409913
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The problems of doing research on human subjects, the particular sensitivity of criminal offending and the requirements of the legal system often rule out the use of the most robust research methods in criminological research. This article illustrates these problems by reference to several criminological controversies, and suggests that these problems may best be addressed by the increasingly multi-disciplinary nature of empirical research in the field. There is also a role for gatekeepers such as peer reviewers of grant applications, publication referees and editors in enhancing the openness and accountability of their work.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 14
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   IS THERE A CASE FOR AN INTERNATIONAL-MEDICAL-SCIENTIFIC-PRESS-COUNCIL [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
CHALMERS, I ;
HERXHEIMER, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02) :166-167
[2]  
[Anonymous], NEW CRIMINOLOGY
[3]  
Barber T. X., 1976, PITFALLS HUMAN RES
[4]  
DAVIS DL, 1992, CHILD WELFARE, V71, P557
[5]  
FARRAGHER E, 1995, REGISTER POLICING RE
[6]  
FORD S, 1990, SCIENCES, V30, P37
[7]  
HUNTER H, 1966, LANCET, P984
[8]  
IRVING B, 1986, POLIC POWERS PROCEDU
[9]  
Johnson R. E., 1979, JUVENILE DELINQUENCY
[10]  
Lemert E., 1967, HUMAN DEVIANCE SOCIA