Bayesian inverse problem and optimization with iterative spatial resampling

被引:21
作者
Mariethoz, Gregoire [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Renard, Philippe [1 ]
Caers, Jef [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Neuchatel, Ctr Hydrogeol, 11 Rue Emile Argand,CP 158, CH-2009 Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] Stanford Univ, ERE Dept, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ New S Wales, Natl Ctr Groundwater Res & Training, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
PROBABILITY PERTURBATION METHOD; GRADUAL DEFORMATION; TRANSMISSIVITY FIELDS; STOCHASTIC SIMULATION; PILOT POINTS; CALIBRATION; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; PARAMETERS; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1029/2010WR009274
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Measurements are often unable to uniquely characterize the subsurface at a desired modeling resolution. In particular, inverse problems involving the characterization of hydraulic properties are typically ill-posed since they generally present more unknowns than data. In a Bayesian context, solutions to such problems consist of a posterior ensemble of models that fit the data (up to a certain precision specified by a likelihood function) and that are a subset of a prior distribution. Two possible approaches for this problem are Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) techniques and optimization (calibration) methods. Both frameworks rely on a perturbation mechanism to steer the search for solutions. When the model parameters are spatially dependent variable fields obtained using geostatistical realizations, such as hydraulic conductivity or porosity, it is not trivial to incur perturbations that respect the prior spatial model. To overcome this problem, we propose a general transition kernel (iterative spatial resampling, ISR) that preserves any spatial model produced by conditional simulation. We also present a stochastic stopping criterion for the optimizations inspired from importance sampling. In the studied cases, this yields posterior distributions reasonably close to the ones obtained by a rejection sampler, but with a greatly reduced number of forward model runs. The technique is general in the sense that it can be used with any conditional geostatistical simulation method, whether it generates continuous or discrete variables. Therefore it allows sampling of different priors and conditioning to a variety of data types. Several examples are provided based on either multi-Gaussian or multiple-point statistics.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Pilot points method incorporating prior information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem
    Alcolea, Andres
    Carrera, Jesus
    Medina, Agustin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (11) : 1678 - 1689
  • [2] Blocking Moving Window algorithm: Conditioning multiple-point simulations to hydrogeological data
    Alcolea, Andres
    Renard, Philippe
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [3] Reducing the impact of a desalination plant using stochastic modeling and optimization techniques
    Alcolea, Andres
    Renard, Philippe
    Mariethoz, Gregoire
    Bertone, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2009, 365 (3-4) : 275 - 288
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, Petroleum geostatistics
  • [5] BALLIN P, 1993, SPE S RES SIM 28 FEB
  • [6] Evolutionary algorithms for the optimization of advective control of contaminated aquifer zones
    Bayer, P
    Finkel, M
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (06) : W065061 - W0650619
  • [7] Besag J, 1995, BIOMETRIKA, V82, P733, DOI 10.2307/2337341
  • [8] Borg I., 1997, MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO
  • [9] History matching under training-image-based geological model constraints
    Caers, J
    [J]. SPE JOURNAL, 2003, 8 (03): : 218 - 226
  • [10] Comparing the gradual deformation with the probability perturbation method for solving inverse problems
    Caers, Jef
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 2007, 39 (01): : 27 - 52