Patient-reported outcome measures for acute and chronic pain: current knowledge and future directions

被引:39
作者
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther [1 ]
Schnabel, Kathrin [1 ]
Kaiser, Ulrike [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Med, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Clarus Dresden, Comprehens Pain Ctr, Dresden, Germany
关键词
acute pain; chronic pain; patient-reported outcome measures; patient-reported outcomes; postoperative pain; TASK-FORCE REPORT; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; POSTSURGICAL PAIN; PRO INSTRUMENTS; MULTIMODAL PAIN; RATING-SCALES; VALIDITY; DOMAINS; SET;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0000000000000780
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review During the past years, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become of growing awareness and importance in medical research and practice. This review summarizes recent developments concerning PROs and PROMs related to pain in the acute postoperative as well as chronic settings and indicates gaps and challenges relevant for future research and clinical applications. Recent findings There are core outcome sets (COSs) of PROs and PROMs developed for specific pain conditions but patients' perception is not sufficiently considered in the development of corresponding concepts and instruments. COSs of PRO and PROMs are crucial in the field of research to enhance the comparability of results and reducing outcome reporting bias. In clinical practice PROs and PROMs are important for allocation of treatment. Concerning the development and implementation of PROs and PROMs patients' perspective should be thoroughly considered. Relating to acute as well as chronic pain there are some attempts to create COSs of PROs and PROMs but validity and reliability for both are still missing.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 622
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: A systematic literature review [J].
Haroutiunian, Simon ;
Nikolajsen, Lone ;
Finnerup, Nanna Brix ;
Jensen, Troels Staehelin .
PAIN, 2013, 154 (01) :95-102
[22]   Do Numerical Rating Scales and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire capture changes that are meaningful to patients with persistent back pain? [J].
Hush, Julia M. ;
Refshauge, Kathryn M. ;
Sullivan, Gerard ;
De Souza, Lorraine ;
McAuley, James H. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 24 (07) :648-657
[23]   Can We Decide Which Outcomes Should Be Measured in Every Clinical Trial? A Scoping Review of the Existing Conceptual Frameworks and Processes to Develop Core Outcome Sets [J].
Idzerda, Leanne ;
Rader, Tamara ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Boers, Maarten .
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (05) :986-993
[24]   Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: the VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains [J].
Kaiser, Ulrike ;
Kopkow, Christian ;
Deckert, Stefanie ;
Neustadt, Katrin ;
Jacobi, Lena ;
Cameron, Paul ;
De Angelis, Valerio ;
Apfelbacher, Christian ;
Arnold, Bernhard ;
Birch, Judy ;
Bjarnegard, Anna ;
Christiansen, Sandra ;
Williams, Amanda C. de C. ;
Gossrau, Gudrun ;
Heinks, Andrea ;
Hueppe, Michael ;
Kiers, Henri ;
Kleinert, Ursula ;
Martelletti, Paolo ;
McCracken, Lance ;
de Meij, Nelleke ;
Nagel, Bernd ;
Nijs, Jo ;
Norda, Heike ;
Singh, Jasvinder A. ;
Spengler, Ellen ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Tugwell, Peter ;
Vlaeyen, Johan W. S. ;
Wandrey, Heike ;
Neugebauer, Edmund ;
Sabatowski, Rainer ;
Schmitt, Jochen .
PAIN, 2018, 159 (04) :673-683
[25]   Core Outcome Sets and Multidimensional Assessment Tools for Harmonizing Outcome Measure in Chronic Pain and Back Pain [J].
Kaiser, Ulrike ;
Neustadt, Katrin ;
Kopkow, Christian ;
Schmitt, Jochen ;
Sabatowski, Rainer .
HEALTHCARE, 2016, 4 (03)
[26]   Outcome Assessment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal [J].
Lange, Toni ;
Rataj, Elisabeth ;
Kopkow, Christian ;
Luetner, Joerg ;
Guenther, Klaus-Peter ;
Schmitt, Jochen .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (02) :653-+
[27]   Fibromyalgia Syndrome Module at OMERACT 9: Domain Construct [J].
Mease, Philip ;
Arnold, Lesley M. ;
Choy, Ernest H. ;
Clauw, Daniel J. ;
Crofford, Leslie J. ;
Glass, Jennifer M. ;
Martin, Susan A. ;
Morea, Jessica ;
Simon, Lee ;
Strand, C. Vibeke ;
Williams, David A. .
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 36 (10) :2318-2329
[28]   The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument [J].
Mokkink, Lidwine B. ;
Prinsen, Cecilia A. C. ;
Bouter, Lex M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 20 (02) :105-113
[29]   Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort [J].
Myles, P. S. ;
Boney, O. ;
Botti, M. ;
Cyna, A. M. ;
Gan, T. J. ;
Jensen, M. P. ;
Kehlet, H. ;
Kurz, A. ;
De Oliveira, G. S., Jr. ;
Peyton, P. ;
Sessler, D. I. ;
Tramer, M. R. ;
Wu, C. L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (04) :705-711
[30]   Content Validity-Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2-Assessing Respondent Understanding [J].
Patrick, Donald L. ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Gwaltney, Chad J. ;
Leidy, Nancy Kline ;
Martin, Mona L. ;
Molsen, Elizabeth ;
Ring, Lena .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (08) :978-988