Mobile Augmented Reality Applications in Teaching: A Proposed Technology Acceptance Model

被引:8
作者
Koutromanos, George [1 ]
Mikropoulos, Tassos A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Primary Educ, Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Educ Approaches Virtual Real Technol Lab, Ioannina, Greece
来源
2021 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IMMERSIVE LEARNING RESEARCH NETWORK (ILRN) | 2021年
关键词
mobile augmented reality; technology acceptance model; teachers; education; SERVICE TEACHERS ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; USER ACCEPTANCE; INTENTION; PRESERVICE; CONSUMERS; EDUCATION; USAGE;
D O I
10.23919/ILRN52045.2021.9459343
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study proposed MARAM, a mobile augmented reality acceptance model that determines the factors that affect teachers' intention to use AR applications in their teaching. MARAM extends TAM by adding the variables of perceived relative advantage, perceived enjoyment, facilitating conditions, and mobile self - efficacy. MARAM was tested in a pilot empirical study with 127 teachers who used educational mobile AR applications and developed their own ones. The results of regression analysis showed that MARAM can predict a satisfactory percentage of the variance in teachers' intention, attitude, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Attitude, perceived usefulness, and facilitating conditions affected intention. Both perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment affected attitude. Furthermore, perceived relative advantage and perceived enjoyment affected perceived usefulness. In addition, mobile self-efficacy and facilitating conditions affected perceived ease of use. However, perceived ease of use did not have any effect on attitude and perceived usefulness. MARAM could serve as the basis for future studies on teachers' acceptance of mobile AR applications and be expanded through the addition of other variables.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 280
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality crossMark for education: A systematic review of the literature
    Akcayir, Murat
    Akcayir, Gokce
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017, 20 : 1 - 11
  • [3] Alhumaidan Haifa., 2018, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, V15, P24, DOI [10.1016/J.IJCCI.2017.11.005, DOI 10.1016/J.IJCCI.2017.11.005, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.005]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, NEW MEANING ED CHANG
  • [5] Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis
    Arici, Faruk
    Yildirim, Pelin
    Caliklar, Seyma
    Yilmaz, Rabia M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 142
  • [6] Mobile Gaming and Student Interactions in a Science Center: the Future of Gaming in Science Education
    Atwood-Blaine, Dana
    Huffman, Douglas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2017, 15 : S45 - S65
  • [7] Baturay MH, 2017, INT J TECHNOL ENHANC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJTEL.2017.10003119
  • [8] Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks
    Danaei, Delneshin
    Jamali, Hamid R.
    Mansourian, Yazdan
    Rastegarpour, Hassan
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 153
  • [10] EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC MOTIVATION TO USE COMPUTERS IN THE WORKPLACE
    DAVIS, FD
    BAGOZZI, RP
    WARSHAW, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (14) : 1111 - 1132