Predictors of treatment response and length of stay for inpatients with major depression

被引:24
作者
Cheng, I-Chih
Liao, Shih-Cheng
Lee, Ming-Been
Tseng, Meg Mei-Chih
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
hospitalization; length of stay; major depression; treatment response; PSYCHIATRIC-PATIENTS; HOSPITAL STAY; DISORDERS; WARD; UNIT;
D O I
10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60060-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Purpose: Depressive illness is highly recurrent, frequently chronic and associated with a high level of functional disability. Studies have shown that depression combined with anxiety is the most common reason for admission worldwide. This study aimed to examine the variables associated with treatment response or length of stay (LOS) among a group of inpatients with major depression. Methods: The attending psychiatrist rated severity of depression (using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, HAM-D) of the patients (n = 67), and the patients were asked to complete several self-rating scales (including the Beck Depression lnventory BDI) on admission. Three days before discharge, these assessments were repeated. Logistic regression models were used to examine the variables of remission status (defined by the HAM-D or the BDI) and LOS (dichotomized by a median of 25 days), respectively. Results: The remission rates of depression at discharge defined by the HAM-D (<= 7) and the BDI (<= 8) were 40% and 16%, respectively. Lower socioeconomic status and less clinical severity at admission were associated with clinicians' objective assessment of remission, while suicide attempt during this index episode was associated with patients' subjective remission. LOS of depressive inpatients was neither related to baseline severity nor to remission status at discharge. Patients with positive family history and more frequent hospitalization were associated with a hospital stay of longer than 25 days. Conclusion: There was no evidence to show that patients with a long hospital stay would gain treatment benefits over patients with short stay. This study provides evidence to support that a structured inpatient treatment plan might gain some economic benefits without compromising treatment efficacy. The admission of hospitalization repeaters should be managed optimally based on the considerations of treatment efficacy and its impact on longer hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 910
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] *AM PSYCHIAT ASS, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN DIS D
  • [2] ANDREWS RM, 1994, PUBLICATION DIVISION
  • [3] [Anonymous], ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT
  • [4] Prognosis of depression
    Baldwin, RC
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 13 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [5] BUTLER KZ, 1999, CLIN HDB PSYCHOTROPI, P45
  • [6] Chen Y., 1980, Acta Paediatrica Sinica, V21, P210
  • [7] COHEN CI, 1989, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V40, P741
  • [8] DEROGATIS L R, 1973, Psychopharmacology Bulletin, V9, P13
  • [9] Draper B, 1998, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V13, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199801)13:1<1::AID-GPS716>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-V