Fuzzy logic for evaluating alternative construction technology

被引:20
作者
Chao, LC [1 ]
Skibniewski, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Bldg & Real Estate, Singapore 117548, Singapore
来源
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 1998年 / 124卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(297)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction environment is changeable and full of uncertainties, so each alternative work method for an operation may have optimistic and pessimistic cost estimates, along with corresponding probabilities. The cost variability and thus the risk of a new technology is often even greater, which affects the acceptability of the technology. The expected monetary values of technology alternatives do not reflect a decision maker's preference for potential gains or his or her aversion to likely adversities. Formal decision analysis techniques, such as the one based on utility theory, must be employed to model a decision maker's value system. As an alternative to those traditional techniques, this paper presents a fuzzy-logic-based, risk-incorporating approach to evaluating new construction technology, intended to produce consistent technology implementation decisions. Its concepts and steps are described in detail, followed by an example in which alternative methods for the formwork operation of a high-rise building project are evaluated. Experimental results show that the approach can produce a consistent evaluation of the available options, according to a set of user-defined linguistic rules that state the priorities in a given project scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 304
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] DECISION-ANALYSIS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION
    CHAO, LC
    SKIBNIEWSKI, MJ
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 1995, 12 (01): : 67 - 82
  • [2] Utility-theory model for markup decisions
    Dozzi, SP
    AbouRizk, SM
    Schroeder, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1996, 122 (02): : 119 - 124
  • [3] Flanagan R., 1989, 'Life Cycle Costing: theory and practice'
  • [4] LIFSON M.W., 1982, DECISION RISK ANAL C
  • [5] LINC CT, 1991, IEEE T COMPUT, V40, P1320
  • [6] RIGGS LS, 1989, MICROCOMPUTERS CIV E, V3, P229
  • [7] EVALUATION OF ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY WITH AHP METHOD
    SKIBNIEWSKI, MJ
    CHAO, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (03): : 577 - 593
  • [8] Sugeno M., 1985, IND APPL FUZZY CONTR