The Impact of active learning strategies in second cycle students of an engineer course: a case study

被引:0
作者
De Oliveira, Cristina Gaspar [1 ]
Andre, Paulo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Ctr Invest Didat & Tecnol Formacao Formadores, Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Inst Telecomunicacoes, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Dept Engn Eletrotecn & Comp, P-1699 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE) | 2014年
关键词
Active Learning; Higher Education; Engineering Education; Students' Motivation; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; HIGHER-EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; QUALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the last years the educational research advocates the use of new teaching and learning approaches, particularly in Higher Education. Simultaneously, the challenges of society requires that Higher Education institutions develop in their students other competences, beyond the academic knowledge. It seems to be consensual that the purpose of Higher Education courses is the development, among its students, of scientific attitude and rigor of reasoning skills, creativity and analysis. Having this in consideration, we implement in the University of Aveiro course of optoelectronics, several strategies that seek to develop transversal competences in future physical engineers. Some of the implement strategies were, for example, minute paper, eBook writing, brainstorming session followed by a concise written report, group development of an experimental short scientific project and feedback assessment to all of these strategies. This paper describes how these strategies were implemented in the course and what students' opinion about them were. Analyzing the results we can concluded that the strategies had different levels of acceptance and we believe that these levels of acceptance have direct impact on student learning.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Group assessment: comparing group and individual undergraduate module marks
    Almond, Richard J.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [2] Angelo T., 1993, CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT, V2nd
  • [3] [Anonymous], COLL TEACHING
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, TEACHING QUALITY LEA
  • [5] Bell B., 2000, Formative Assessment and Science Education
  • [6] Bernhard J., 2000, PTEE2000 PHYS TEACHI
  • [7] Biggs J., 2007, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Vthird
  • [8] Bonwell C., 1991, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom, V1
  • [9] Burdett J., 2003, International Education Journal, V4, P177
  • [10] Carli H., 2006, SYNERGISMUS SCYENTIF, P432