Early Bone Healing on Hydroxyapatite-Coated and Chemically-Modified Hydrophilic Implant Surfaces in an Ovine Model

被引:8
作者
Ajami, Elnaz [1 ]
Fu, Cong [1 ]
Wen, Hai Bo [1 ]
Bassett, Jeffrey [1 ]
Park, Sun Jin [1 ]
Pollard, Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Zimmer Biomet Dent, Dept Res & Dev, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 USA
关键词
peri-implant bone; osseointegration; hydroxyapatite; histomorphometry; DENTAL IMPLANTS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES; COATINGS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; APPOSITION; CONTACT; TORQUE;
D O I
10.3390/ijms22179361
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Implant topography affects early peri-implant bone healing by changing the osteoconduction rate in the surrounding biological environment. Implant surfaces have been designed to promote faster and stronger bone formation for rapid and stable prosthesis loading. Early peri-implant bone healing has been observed with a sandblasted, acid-etched implant that was chemically modified to be hydrophilic (cmSLA). The present study investigates whether early peri-implant bone healing extends to a rough surface implant with a high crystalline hydroxyapatite surface (TSV MP-1 HA). Three implants were randomly placed in porous trabecular bone within both medial femoral condyles of 10 sheep. Early peri-implant bone stability was measured at 3- and 6-weeks healing time following implant insertion. Results indicated a similar implant stability quotient between the implants at insertion and over time. The significant increase over time of reverse torque values with respect to insertion torque (p < 0.001) did not differ between the implants. However, the bone-to-implant contact of TSV MP-1 HA was significantly higher than that of cmSLA implants at 6 weeks (p < 0.01). These data validate previous findings of a hydrophilic implant surface and extend the observation of early osseointegration to a rough surface implant in porous trabecular bone.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep [J].
Abdel-Haq, Jawad ;
Karabuda, Cuneyt Z. ;
Arisan, Volkan ;
Mutlu, Zihni ;
Kurkcu, Mehmet .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) :265-274
[2]   Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs [J].
Al-Hamdan, Khalid ;
Al-Moaber, Samar H. ;
Junker, Rudiger ;
Jansen, John A. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (04) :399-405
[3]   Influence of a zirconia sandblasting treated surface on peri-implant bone healing: An experimental study in sheep [J].
Bacchelli, Beatrice ;
Giavaresi, Gianluca ;
Franchi, Marco ;
Martini, Desiree ;
De Pasquale, Viviana ;
Trire, Alessandra ;
Fini, Milena ;
Giardino, Roberto ;
Ruggeri, Alessandro .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2009, 5 (06) :2246-2257
[4]   COMPARISON OF BONE-IMPLANT CONTACT AND BONE-IMPLANT VOLUME BETWEEN 2D-HISTOLOGICAL SECTIONS AND 3D-SRμCT SLICES [J].
Bernhardt, Ricardo ;
Kuhlisch, Eberhard ;
Schulz, Matthias C. ;
Eckelt, Uwe ;
Stadlinger, Bernd .
EUROPEAN CELLS & MATERIALS, 2012, 23 :237-248
[5]  
Binahmed A, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P963
[6]   Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles [J].
Bornstein, Michael M. ;
Valderrama, Pilar ;
Jones, Archie A. ;
Wilson, Thomas G. ;
Seibl, Reinhart ;
Cochran, David L. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (03) :233-241
[7]   Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface [J].
Buser, D ;
Broggini, N ;
Wieland, M ;
Schenk, RK ;
Denzer, AJ ;
Cochran, DL ;
Hoffmann, B ;
Lussi, A ;
Steinemann, SG .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 83 (07) :529-533
[8]   The Effect of a Keratin Hydrogel Coating on Osseointegration: An Histological Comparison of Coated and Non-coated Dental Titanium Implants in an Ovine Model [J].
Campbell D.I. ;
Duncan W.J. .
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2014, 13 (2) :159-164
[9]  
Chugh Tina, 2013, J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, V3, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.01.001
[10]  
Cook S D, 1992, J Oral Implantol, V18, P359