Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean delivery

被引:12
作者
Rizk, DEE [1 ]
Nsanze, H
Mabrouk, MH
Mustafa, N
Thomas, L
Kumar, M
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Med Microbiol, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[3] Al Ain Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
antibiotics; cefuroxime; elective cesarean delivery; endometritis; infection; prophylaxis;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00062-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the value of using prophylactic antibiotics at elective cesarean delivery. Method: One-hundred and twenty women delivered by elective cesarean in the absence of labor and before the rupture of membranes were randomized to receive either 1.5 g of cefuroxime intravenously at cord clamping (n = 59) or no prophylaxis (control group, n = 61). Results. Twelve women developed febrile morbidity (six study, six control, P = 0.09). Of these, five had endometritis (two study, three control, P = 0.09) and two had wound infection (one study, one control, P = 0.09). Ten more women had microbiological evidence of endometritis and wound infection (six study, four control, P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the hospital stay (6.5 days study, 6.8 days control, P = 0.06). Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest pathogen accounting for 14 infection episodes. Amniotic fluid culture could not predict the development of infection. Conclusion: Administration of prophylactic antibiotics at elective cesarean deliveries was not associated with decreased postoperative morbidity. (C) 1998 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 251
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
CARLSON C, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V76, P343
[2]  
CHANG PL, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P117
[3]  
DUFF P, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P718
[5]   INFECTIONS COMPLICATING LOW-RISK CESAREAN SECTIONS IN COMMUNITY HOSPITALS - EFFICACY OF ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS [J].
EHRENKRANZ, NJ ;
BLACKWELDER, WC ;
PFAFF, SJ ;
POPPE, D ;
YERG, DE ;
KASLOW, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (02) :337-343
[6]  
EMMONS SL, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P559
[7]   ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS - IS THERE A DIFFERENCE [J].
FARO, S ;
MARTENS, MG ;
HAMMILL, HA ;
RIDDLE, G ;
TORTOLERO, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (04) :900-909
[8]   ANTIBIOTIC FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - THE CASE FOR TRUE PROPHYLAXIS [J].
FEJGIN, MD ;
MARKOV, S ;
GOSHEN, S ;
SEGAL, J ;
ARBEL, Y ;
LANG, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1993, 43 (03) :257-261
[9]   COST-EFFECTIVE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS FOR CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
FORD, LC ;
HAMMIL, HA ;
LEBHERZ, TB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (02) :506-510
[10]  
GONIK B, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P179