The effect of ambiguous prior knowledge on Bayesian model parameter inference and prediction

被引:9
作者
Rinderknecht, Simon L. [1 ,2 ]
Albert, Carlo [1 ]
Borsuk, Mark E. [3 ]
Schuwirth, Nele [1 ]
Kuensch, Hans R. [4 ]
Reichert, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Eawag, Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Dept Syst Anal Integrated Assessment & Modelling, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Inst Biogeochem & Pollutant Dynam IBP, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Thayer Sch Engn, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] ETH, SfS, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Intersubjective knowledge; Imprecise probabilities; Interval probabilities; Robust Bayesian analysis; Density Ratio Class; Bayesian inference; Marginalization and prediction; UNCERTAINTY; PROBABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.020
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Environmental modeling often requires combining prior knowledge with information obtained from data. The robust Bayesian approach makes it possible to consider ambiguity in this prior knowledge. Describing such ambiguity using sets of probability distributions defined by the Density Ratio Class has important conceptual advantages over alternative robust formulations. Earlier studies showed that the Density Ratio Class is invariant under Bayesian inference and marginalization. We prove that (i) the Density Ratio Class is also invariant under propagation through deterministic models, whereas (ii) predictions of a stochastic model with parameters defined by a Density Ratio Class are embedded in a Density Ratio Class. These invariance properties make it possible to describe sequential learning and prediction under a unified framework. We developed numerical algorithms to minimize the additional computational burden relative to the use of single priors. Practical feasibility of these methods is demonstrated by their application to a simple ecological model. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 315
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]  
Gamerman Dani, 2006, Texts in Statistical Science
[22]   Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions [J].
Garthwaite, PH ;
Kadane, JB ;
O'Hagan, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 100 (470) :680-700
[23]  
Gelman A, 1998, STAT SCI, V13, P163
[24]   INTERSUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND CONFIRMATION THEORY [J].
GILLIES, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1991, 42 (04) :513-533
[25]   Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle [J].
Gollier, C ;
Treich, N .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2003, 27 (01) :77-103
[26]  
Howson C., 2006, SCI REASONING BAYESI
[27]  
Jenkinson D., 2005, TECHNICAL REPORT
[28]  
Kadane JB, 1998, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V47, P3
[29]   The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling [J].
Krueger, Tobias ;
Page, Trevor ;
Hubacek, Klaus ;
Smith, Laurence ;
Hiscock, Kevin .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2012, 36 :4-18
[30]   EQUATION OF STATE CALCULATIONS BY FAST COMPUTING MACHINES [J].
METROPOLIS, N ;
ROSENBLUTH, AW ;
ROSENBLUTH, MN ;
TELLER, AH ;
TELLER, E .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1953, 21 (06) :1087-1092