The effect of ambiguous prior knowledge on Bayesian model parameter inference and prediction

被引:9
作者
Rinderknecht, Simon L. [1 ,2 ]
Albert, Carlo [1 ]
Borsuk, Mark E. [3 ]
Schuwirth, Nele [1 ]
Kuensch, Hans R. [4 ]
Reichert, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Eawag, Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Dept Syst Anal Integrated Assessment & Modelling, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Inst Biogeochem & Pollutant Dynam IBP, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Thayer Sch Engn, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] ETH, SfS, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Intersubjective knowledge; Imprecise probabilities; Interval probabilities; Robust Bayesian analysis; Density Ratio Class; Bayesian inference; Marginalization and prediction; UNCERTAINTY; PROBABILITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.020
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Environmental modeling often requires combining prior knowledge with information obtained from data. The robust Bayesian approach makes it possible to consider ambiguity in this prior knowledge. Describing such ambiguity using sets of probability distributions defined by the Density Ratio Class has important conceptual advantages over alternative robust formulations. Earlier studies showed that the Density Ratio Class is invariant under Bayesian inference and marginalization. We prove that (i) the Density Ratio Class is also invariant under propagation through deterministic models, whereas (ii) predictions of a stochastic model with parameters defined by a Density Ratio Class are embedded in a Density Ratio Class. These invariance properties make it possible to describe sequential learning and prediction under a unified framework. We developed numerical algorithms to minimize the additional computational burden relative to the use of single priors. Practical feasibility of these methods is demonstrated by their application to a simple ecological model. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 315
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Robust Bayesian Analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, THEORY PROBABILITY C
[4]  
Arreaza A, 2011, THESIS ETH
[5]  
Berger J. O., 1994, Test, V3, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF02562676
[6]   ROBUST BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS - SENSITIVITY TO THE PRIOR [J].
BERGER, JO .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1990, 25 (03) :303-328
[7]  
Biggs B.J.F., 1994, NEW ZEAL J MAR FRESH, V28, P119
[8]   Assessing the importance of a self-generated detachment process in river biofilm models [J].
Boulêtreau, S ;
Garabétian, F ;
Sauvage, S ;
Sánchez-Pérez, JM .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (05) :901-912
[9]  
Box G.E., 2011, Bayesian inference in statistical analysis
[10]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252