US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in AEP v. Connecticut

被引：0
作者：
不详
机构：
来源：
JCT COATINGSTECH | 2011年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号：
081704 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：20 / 20
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Humor and Persuasion: The Effects of Laughter during US Supreme Court's Oral Arguments [J].
Li, Siyu ;
Pryor, Tom .
LAW & POLICY, 2020, 42 (02) :162-185
[32]   SUPREME-COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS ON ASGROW V WINTERBOER CASE - RULING ON SAVED SEED EXEMPTION EXPECTED IN 1995 [J].
不详 .
DIVERSITY, 1994, 10 (04) :41-42
[33]   SUPREME-COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS ON TAX BREAKS FOR RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY PRIVATE SCHOOLS [J].
FLYGARE, TJ .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1983, 64 (05) :369-369
[34]   Emotions, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making [J].
Black, Ryan C. ;
Treul, Sarah A. ;
Johnson, Timothy R. ;
Goldman, Jerry .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2011, 73 (02) :572-581
[35]   Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments [J].
Patton, Dana ;
Smith, Joseph L. .
JOURNAL OF WOMEN POLITICS & POLICY, 2020, 41 (04) :393-415
[36]   Information, oral arguments, and Supreme Court decision making [J].
Johnson, TR .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (04) :331-351
[37]   Assessing Threats to Inference with Simultaneous Sensitivity Analysis: The Case of US Supreme Court Oral Arguments [J].
Budziak, Jeffrey ;
Lempert, Daniel .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2018, 6 (01) :33-56
[38]   Pardon the Interruption: An Analysis of Gender and Turn-Taking in US Supreme Court Oral Arguments [J].
Lepp, Haley ;
Levow, Gina-Anne .
INTERSPEECH 2020, 2020, :1838-1842
[39]   State v. Laxton: How the Wisconsin Supreme Court ignored the US Supreme Court (and why it may have gotten away with it) [J].
Barber, EG .
WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 2003, (05) :977-1012
[40]   US Court hears Arch, SNPE arguments in hydrazine propellant contract case [J].
Walsh, K .
CHEMICAL WEEK, 2005, 167 (03) :9-9
12345