Job satisfaction and sustainability of midwives working in caseload models of care: An integrative literature review

被引:25
作者
Hanley, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Davis, Deborah [1 ,2 ]
Kurz, Ella [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] ACT Govt Hlth Directorate, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Univ Dr, Belconnen, ACT 2617, Australia
关键词
Midwifery continuity of care; Job satisfaction; Job sustainability; Caseload midwifery care; Systematic review; CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY; STANDARD MATERNITY CARE; MIDWIFERY CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; LED CARE; BURNOUT; EXPERIENCES; CONTINUITY; VICTORIA; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Demand for caseload midwifery care continues to outstrip supply. We know little about what sustains midwives working in caseload models of care. Aim: This review systematically identifies and synthesises research findings reporting on factors which contribute to job satisfaction, and therefore the sustainability of practice, of midwives working in caseload models of care. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy explored the electronic databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, PubMED, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Articles were assessed using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. Data analysis and synthesis of these publications were conducted using a narrative synthesis approach. Findings: Twenty-two articles were reviewed. Factors which contribute to the job satisfaction and sustainability of practice of midwives working in caseload models are: the ability to build relationships with women; flexibility and control over own working arrangements; professional autonomy and identity; and, organisational and practice arrangements. Conclusion: Insights into the factors which contribute to the job satisfaction and sustainability of practice of midwives in caseload models of care enables both midwives and healthcare administrators to more effectively implement and support midwifery-led caseload models of care which have been shown to improve outcomes for childbearing women. (c) 2021 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E397 / E407
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NURS MIDW WORKF 2015
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Australia's health workforce, research report
[3]  
Booth A., 2016, Systematic approaches to a successful literature review
[4]   An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice [J].
Collins, Carmel T. ;
Fereday, Jennifer ;
Pincombe, Jan ;
Oster, Candice ;
Turnbull, Deborah .
MIDWIFERY, 2010, 26 (04) :435-441
[5]  
Common L., 2015, British Journal of Midwifery, V23, P716
[6]   Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis [J].
Cooke, Alison ;
Smith, Debbie ;
Booth, Andrew .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) :1435-1443
[7]  
Cox P., 2011, New Zeal Coll Midwives J, V44, P17
[8]   Are midwives in the Netherlands satisfied with their jobs? A systematic examination of satisfaction levels among hospital and primary-care midwives in the Netherlands [J].
Cronie, Doug ;
Perdok, Hilde ;
Verhoeven, Corine ;
Jans, Suze ;
Hermus, Marieke ;
de Vries, Raymond ;
Rijnders, Marlies .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
[9]   Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial [J].
Crowe, Michael ;
Sheppard, Lorraine ;
Campbell, Alistair .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2011, 9 (04) :444-449
[10]   Operationalising caseload midwifery in the Australian public maternity system: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of maternity managers [J].
Dawson, Kate ;
Forster, Della A. ;
McLachlan, Helen L. ;
Newton, Michelle S. .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2018, 31 (03) :194-201