Bringing Service Interactions Into Focus: Prevention- Versus Promotion-Focused Customers' Sensitivity to Employee Display Authenticity

被引:39
作者
Lechner, Andreas T. [1 ]
Mathmann, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Augsburg, Fac Business & Econ, Univ Str 16, D-86159 Augsburg, Germany
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
authenticity; emotional labor; regulatory focus; service performance; tipping; REGULATORY FOCUS; EMOTIONAL LABOR; MODERATING ROLE; DECEPTION; CONSUMER; SMILE; PERCEPTIONS; RESPONSES; JUDGMENT; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1177/1094670520904417
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite growing managerial interest in frontline employee behavior, and in display authenticity specifically, customers' heterogeneous reactions to authentic displays have received little scholarly attention. Drawing on emotion as social information theory, we investigate the role of motivational orientations (i.e., regulatory focus) in customer reactions to authentic displays. The findings show that inauthentic displays have stronger negative effects on service performance for prevention-focused than for promotion-focused customers. A dyadic field study details these effects in terms of tipping, and three experiments provide further evidence by experimentally manipulating authenticity and regulatory focus. The conditional effect of authenticity on service performance also is mediated by inferred deception. Specifically, prevention-focused customers interpret inauthentic emotion displays as more deceptive than promotion-focused customers do. Managers should prime customers' promotion focus using marketing communications before the service delivery when inauthentic displays are likely as well as consider customers' regulatory focus when designing authenticity training for employees.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 300
页数:17
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Service with a smile: Does the type of smile matter? [J].
Andrzejewski, Susan A. ;
Mooney, Emily C. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2016, 29 :135-141
[2]  
[Anonymous], CULTURE
[3]   Perceived deception in negotiation: Consequences and the mediating role of trust [J].
Au, Al K. C. ;
Wong, Nicholas C. Q. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 159 (04) :459-473
[4]   SELF-OTHER PERCEPTION OF THE INTENSITY OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS OF EMOTION - DO WE KNOW WHAT WE SHOW [J].
BARR, CL ;
KLECK, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (04) :608-618
[5]   Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus, on team processes and performance [J].
Beersma, Bianca ;
Homan, Astrid C. ;
Van Kleef, Gerben A. ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2013, 121 (02) :194-203
[6]  
Best Buy, 2018, CULTURE
[7]  
Bird J., 2018, ROBOT RESTAURANT REV
[8]   FISHY-LOOKING LIARS - DECEPTION JUDGMENT FROM EXPECTANCY VIOLATION [J].
BOND, CF ;
OMAR, A ;
PITRE, U ;
LASHLEY, BR ;
SKAGGS, LM ;
KIRK, CT .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (06) :969-977
[9]   A Dyadic Model of Customer Orientation: Mediation and Moderation Effects [J].
Brach, Simon ;
Walsh, Gianfranco ;
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten ;
Groth, Markus .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 26 (02) :292-309
[10]   Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work [J].
Brockner, J ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 86 (01) :35-66