Leadership Excellence in Corporate Communications: A Multi-Group Test of Measurement Invariance

被引:0
作者
Meng, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
measurement invariance; multiple-group sample; survey research; structural equation modeling; corporate communications; leadership excellence; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; OF-FIT INDEXES; PUBLIC-RELATIONS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; SELF-CONCEPT; MODELS; SEM;
D O I
10.1177/21582440211061375
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study aims at advancing leadership research in corporate communications by introducing a more rigorous statistical approach to test whether communication professionals of different hierarchical reporting levels, years of experience, and educational backgrounds would ascribe the same meanings to the construct of leadership excellence in corporate communications via survey research. By using an established measurement model of leadership excellence in corporate communications, the study uses three samples, including senior communication executives/leaders, mid-level communication professionals, and senior college students majoring in communication and/or public relations, to conduct the measurement invariance tests. By imposing constraints to different parameters in a sequence of nested models, findings indicate that the measures of leadership excellence in corporate communications can be equivalent across multiple groups. Measurement invariance was confirmed at multiple levels, including the higher-order measurement model, configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, and error invariance. This study deepens our understanding of measurement invariance when applying multi-group comparison in testing leadership excellence. Such evidence can also be used as central principles when developing corresponding leadership training and development modules by organizations in supporting multicultural and multi-group sensitivity in leadership development. Future research and practical implications are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Confirmatory factor analysis, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118619179
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, METHODS DATA ANAL CR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, MANAGE COMMUN Q, DOI DOI 10.1177/0893318996010001005
[4]   A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. ;
Edwards, Jeffrey R. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (01) :45-87
[5]   ON THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS IN EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
YI, YJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (03) :271-284
[6]   Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: Is fair selection possible? [J].
Borsboom, Denny ;
Romeijn, Jan-Willem ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (02) :75-98
[7]   Personality Across the Lifespan Exploring Measurement Invariance of a Short Big Five Inventory From Ages 11 to 84 [J].
Brandt, Naemi D. ;
Becker, Michael ;
Tetzner, Julia ;
Brunner, Martin ;
Kuhl, Poldi ;
Maaz, Kai .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 36 (01) :162-173
[8]  
Brown T.A., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[9]  
Bryne B., 1994, Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows
[10]  
Bryne B.M., 1999, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V30, P20