Usefulness of high-speed rotational coronary venous angiography during cardiac resynchronization therapy

Standard coronary venous angiography (SCVA) provides a static, fixed projection of the coronary venous (CV) tree. High-speed rotational coronary venous angiography (RCVA) is a novel method of mapping CV anatomy using dynamic, multiangle visualization. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of RCVA during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Digitally acquired rotational CV angiograms from 49 patients (mean age 69 +/- 11 years) who underwent left ventricular lead implantation were analyzed. RCVA, which uses rapid isocentric rotation over a 110 degrees arc, acquiring 120 frames/angiogram, was compared with SCVA, defined as 2 static orthogonal views: right anterior oblique 45 degrees and left anterior oblique 45 degrees. RCVA demonstrated that the posterior vein-to-coronary sinus (CS) angle and the left marginal vein-to-CS angle were misclassified in 5 and 11 patients, respectively, using SCVA. RCVA identified a greater number of second-order tributaries with diameters > 1.5 mm than SCVA. The CV branch selected for lead placement was initially identified in 100% of patients using RCVA but in only 74% of patients using SCVA. RCVA showed that the best angiographic view for visualizing the CS and its tributaries differed significantly among different areas of the CV tree and among patients. The area of the CV tree that showed less variability was the CS ostium, which had a fairly constant relation with the spine in shallow right anterior oblique and left anterior oblique projections. In conclusion, RCVA provided a more precise map of CV anatomy and the spatial relation of venous branches. It allowed the identification of fluoroscopic views that could facilitate cannulation of the CS. The final x-ray view displaying the appropriate CV branch for left ventricular lead implantation was often different from the conventional left anterior oblique and right anterior oblique views. RCVA identified the target branch for lead implantation more often than SCVA. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.