What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world

被引:399
作者
Pagdee, A [1 ]
Kim, YS
Daugherty, PJ
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Environm Sci, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
关键词
common-pool resources; meta-study; property rights regimes; world-wide community forestry;
D O I
10.1080/08941920500323260
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Thirty-one articles on community forestry, encompassing 69 case studies worldwide, were reviewed for systematic data synthesis and hypothesis testing. The meta-study identifies 43 independent variables ranging from internal attributes of the community and resources to external factors. Variables with significant influence on the success of community forestry are tenure security, clear ownership, congruence between biophysical and socioeconomic boundaries of the resources, effective enforcement of rules and regulations, monitoring, sanctioning, strong leadership with capable local organization, expectation of benefits, common interests among community members, and local authority. These variables illustrate community forest relationships, community ability to organize and continue collective activities, and protection of benefits, rights, and responsibilities in common resource management.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 52
页数:20
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[2]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[3]  
Baland J. M., 1996, Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities?
[4]   The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management [J].
Baland, JM ;
Platteau, JP .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (05) :773-788
[5]  
Bhattarai TN, 1985, COMMUNITY FORESTRY D
[6]  
Borrini-Feyerabend G., 2000, COMANAGEMENT NATURAL
[7]  
Bromley D., 1989, Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy
[8]   Understanding public participation in forest planning: A review [J].
Buchy, M. ;
Hoverman, S. .
Forest Policy and Economics, 2000, 1 (01) :15-25
[9]   SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :417-451
[10]  
Hanna S., 1995, Property rights and the environment: social and ecological issues., P59