Evaluation of clinical safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in comparison with right ventricular septal pacing

被引:5
作者
Liu, Xing [1 ]
Li, Wenbin [1 ]
Zeng, Jianping [1 ]
Huang, He [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Tian, Shaohua [1 ]
Wu, Mingxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiangtan Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Xiangtan 411100, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
left bundle branch area pacing; left ventricular function; right ventricular septal pacing; ventricular synchrony; CARDIAC-RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; HEART-FAILURE; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000029071
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) has recently emerged as a new physiological pacing strategy. The purpose of this study is to compare LBBaP with right ventricular sepal pacing (RVSP) in terms of their clinical safety and efficacy. From February 2019 to May 2020, consecutive pacing-indicated patients were prospectively enrolled and divided into 2 groups. Ventricular synchrony indexes such as QRS duration (QRSd), interventricular mechanical delay and septal-posterior wall motion delay, left ventricular function such as left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), pacing parameters, and complications were evaluated in the perioperative period and during follow-up. LBBaP was successful in 45 patients (88.2%), and finally 46 patients underwent RVSP. With LBBaP, ventricular electricalmechanical synchrony were similar to those of native-conduction system (P = .78). However, the ventricular electrical synchrony (QRSd, 108.47 +/- 7.64 vs 130.63 +/- 13.63ms, P < .001) and mechanical synchrony (interventricular mechanical delay, 27.68 +/- 4.33 vs 39.88 +/- 5.83, P < .001; septal-posterior wall motion delay, 40.39 +/- 23.21 vs 96.36 +/- 11.55, P < .001) in the LBBaP group were significantly better than those in the RVSP group. No significant differences in LVEDD (46 [44-48.5] vs 47 [44-52] mm, P = .49) and LVEF% (66 [62.5-70] vs 64 [61-68], P = .76) was observed between 2 groups at last follow-up. But, in the subgroup analysis, LVEDD was shorter (46 [44-49] vs 50 [47-58] mm, P = .03) and the LVEF% was higher (65 [62-68] vs 63 [58-65], P = .02) in the LBBaP-H (high ventricular pacing ratio >40%) group compared with RVSP-H group at last follow-up. There were lower capture thresholds (0.59 +/- 0.18V vs 0.71 +/- 0.26 V, P = 0.01) at implantation in the LBBaP group than those in the RVSP group, with R-wave amplitudes and pacing impedances showing no significant difference between 2 groups. No serious complications were found in both 2 groups at implantation and follow-ups. This study confirms the clinical safety and efficacy of LBBaP, and it produces better ventricular electrical-mechanical synchrony than RVSP. The event of pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction is lower in the LBBaP-H group than RVSP-H group.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlations between myocardial injury current and lead performance in His bundle pacing compared with left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular septum pacing
    Chung, Wei-Hsin
    Wu, Hung-Pin
    Wu, Mei-Yao
    Lin, Yen-Nien
    Chen, Jan-Yow
    Lin, Kuo-Hung
    Chang, Kuan-Cheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (06) : 1349 - 1358
  • [42] Correlations between myocardial injury current and lead performance in His bundle pacing compared with left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular septum pacing
    Wei-Hsin Chung
    Hung-Pin Wu
    Mei-Yao Wu
    Yen-Nien Lin
    Jan-Yow Chen
    Kuo-Hung Lin
    Kuan-Cheng Chang
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 1349 - 1358
  • [43] Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Following Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Right Ventricular Pacing and Biventricular Pacing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Bing
    Dai, Wenlong
    Lou, Yake
    Li, Yulin
    Wu, Yongquan
    Du, Jie
    [J]. REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (08)
  • [44] Left bundle branch area pacing results in more physiological ventricular activation than biventricular pacing in patients with left bundle branch block heart failure
    Sussenbek, Ondrej
    Rademakers, Leonard
    Waldauf, Petr
    Jurak, Pavel
    Smisek, Radovan
    Stros, Petr
    Poviser, Lukas
    Vesela, Jana
    Plesinger, Filip
    Halamek, Josef
    Leinveber, Pavel
    Herman, Dalibor
    Osmancik, Pavel
    Curila, Karol
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2023, 25 : E17 - E24
  • [45] Comparison of Procedure and Fluoroscopy Time Between Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Right Ventricular Pacing for Bradycardia: The Learning Curve for the Novel Pacing Strategy
    Wang, Zhao
    Zhu, Haojie
    Li, Xiaofei
    Yao, Yan
    Liu, Zhimin
    Fan, Xiaohan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [46] Early effects of left bundle branch area pacing on ventricular activation by speckle tracking echocardiography
    Dell'Era, Gabriele
    Ghiglieno, Chiara
    Degiovanni, Anna
    De Vecchi, Federica
    Porcellini, Stefano
    Santagostino, Matteo
    Veroli, Alessandro
    D'Amico, Anthea
    Spinoni, Enrico Guido
    Patti, Giuseppe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (02) : 341 - 351
  • [47] Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch pacing compared to right ventricular apical pacing in patients with atrioventricular block
    Zhang, Shigeng
    Guo, Junfang
    Tao, Aibin
    Zhang, Baowei
    Bao, Zhonghua
    Zhang, Guohui
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (04) : 481 - 487
  • [48] Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes with left bundle branch pacing, left ventricular septal pacing, and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Zhu, Haojie
    Qin, Chaotong
    Du, Anjie
    Wang, Qian
    He, Chen
    Zou, Fengwei
    Li, Xiaofei
    Tao, Jin
    Wang, Chuangshi
    Liu, Zhimin
    Xue, Siyuan
    Zeng, Jiaxin
    Qian, Zhiyong
    Wang, Yao
    Hou, Xiaofeng
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Gold, Michael R.
    Yao, Yan
    Zou, Jiangang
    Fan, Xiaohan
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (08) : 1342 - 1353
  • [49] Which Is More Likely to Achieve Cardiac Synchronization: Left Bundle Branch Pacing or Left Ventricular Septal Pacing?
    Zhu, Kailun
    Chang, Dong
    Li, Qiang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [50] Comparison of cardiac function between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing in the short-term: A registered controlled clinical trial
    Liu, Qian
    Yang, Jing
    Bolun, Zhou
    Pei, Miao
    Ma, Bofei
    Tong, Qiaoli
    Yin, Hongning
    Zhang, Yan
    You, Ling
    Xie, Ruiqin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 322 : 70 - 76