Governing urban development for climate risk: What role for public-private partnerships?

被引:17
作者
Taylor, Bruce M. [1 ]
Harman, Ben P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO Land & Water, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2016年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
Governance; greenfield development; climate adaptation; master planned estates; public-private partnerships; BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS; CHANGE ADAPTATION; MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE; REGENERATION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; REDEVELOPMENT; DISTINCTION; CHALLENGES; GOVERNMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0263774X15614692
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban partnerships are an instrument of urban governance common in major urban development projects. However, the potential for these traditional urban policy instruments to promote climate-adapted greenfield development remains largely untested. This study examines this potential through an analysis of four urban development partnerships for master-planned estates in two rapidly urbanising regions of Australia. We interview private property developers, government land organisations and municipal level actors. The analysis focuses on the convergence, and tensions, between partners' goals of affordability, profitability and sustainability; benefits and risks of partnering; and, the management of assets over time, in light of environmental risks. The partnerships studied contributed to the state's capacity to implement policy efficiently, encourage innovation and de-risk projects for private partners. However, these initiatives also transferred longer term environmental risks to the broader planning system and to non-partners. The central role of the state in coordinating these arrangements presents opportunities to redress these limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 944
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]   Business Improvement Districts in England and the (private?) governance of urban spaces [J].
De Magalhaes, Claudio .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (05) :916-933
[22]   Privatism, Privatisation and Social Distinction in Master-Planned Residential Estates [J].
Dowling, Robyn ;
Atkinson, Rowland ;
McGuirk, Pauline .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (04) :391-410
[23]   Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks [J].
Fuenfgeld, Hartmut .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 12 :67-73
[24]   Institutional challenges to climate risk management in cities [J].
Fuenfgeld, Hartmut .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 2 (03) :156-160
[25]   Urban partnerships and climate adaptation: challenges and opportunities [J].
Harman, Ben P. ;
Taylor, Bruce M. ;
Lane, Marcus B. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 12 :74-79
[26]   Neoliberal Experiments with Urban Infrastructure: The Cross City Tunnel, Sydney [J].
Haughton, Graham ;
McManus, Phil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (01) :90-105
[27]   Public-Private Partnerships: Promises, Politics and Pitfalls [J].
Hayllar, Mark Richard ;
Wettenhall, Roger .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 69 :S1-S7
[28]   Public-Private Partnerships: Governance Scheme or Language Game? [J].
Hodge, Graeme ;
Greve, Carsten .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 69 :S8-S22
[29]   Public-private partnerships: An international performance review [J].
Hodge, Graeme A. ;
Greve, Carsten .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (03) :545-558
[30]   Entanglement: The Negotiation of Urban Development Imperatives in Durban's Public-Private Partnerships [J].
Houghton, Jennifer .
URBAN STUDIES, 2013, 50 (13) :2791-2808