A rubric to assess critical literature evaluation skills

被引:28
作者
Blommel, Matthew L. [1 ]
Abate, Marie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Sch Pharm, W Virgina Ctr Drug & Hlth Informat, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
journal club; rubric; literature evaluation; drug information; assessment; evidence-based medicine; advanced pharmacy practice experience; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.5688/aj710463
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective. To develop and describe the use of a rubric for reinforcing critical literature evaluation skills and assessing journal article critiques presented by pharmacy students during journal club exercises. Design. A rubric was developed, tested, and revised as needed to guide students in presenting a published study critique during the second through fourth years of a first- professional doctor of pharmacy degree curriculum and to help faculty members assess student performance and provide formative feedback. Through each rubric iteration, the ease of use and clarity for both evaluators and students were determined with modifications made as indicated. Student feedback was obtained after using the rubric for journal article exercises, and interrater reliability of the rubric was determined. Assessment. Student feedback regarding rubric use for preparing a clinical study critique was positive across years. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for each rubric section. The rubric was modified a total of 5 times based upon student feedback and faculty discussions. Conclusion. A properly designed and tested rubric can be a useful tool for evaluating student performance during a journal article presentation; however, a rubric can take considerable time to develop. A rubric can also be a valuable student learning aid for applying literature evaluation concepts to the critique of a published study.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ACAD MED, V76, P958
[3]  
ARTER J, 2001, SCORING RUBRICS CLAS, P1
[4]   Journal club 101 for the new practitioner: Evaluation of a clinical trial [J].
Askew, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2004, 61 (18) :1885-1887
[5]   Comparison of drug information practice curriculum components in US colleges of pharmacy [J].
Cole, SW ;
Berensen, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 69 (02) :240-244
[6]   Critical appraisal in clinical practice: sometimes irrelevant, occasionally invalid [J].
Coomarasamy, A ;
Latthe, P ;
Papaioannou, S ;
Publicover, M ;
Gee, H ;
Khan, KS .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2001, 94 (11) :573-577
[7]   Introducing evidence based medicine to the journal club, using a structured pre and post test: a cohort study [J].
J Steven Cramer ;
Martin C Mahoney .
BMC Medical Education, 1 (1)
[8]   Designing, conducting, and evaluating journal clubs in orthopaedic surgery [J].
Dirschl, DR ;
Tornetta, P ;
Bhandari, M .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (413) :146-157
[9]  
Heiligman R M, 1991, Fam Med, V23, P152
[10]   A CHECKLIST SYSTEM FOR CRITICAL-REVIEW OF MEDICAL LITERATURE [J].
KROGH, CL .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1985, 19 (05) :392-395