Symmetry influences packaging aesthetic evaluation and purchase intention

被引:37
作者
Bigoin-Gagnan, Arnaud [1 ]
Lacoste-Badie, Sophie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, Rennes Grad Sch Management, CREM, CNRS,UMR 6211, Rennes, France
[2] Univ Lille, Lille Grad Sch Management, LEM, CNRS,UMR 9221, Lille, France
关键词
Purchase intention; Symmetry; Package design; Aesthetic evaluation; Perceived complexity; Perceptual fluency; PROCESSING FLUENCY; VISUAL COMPLEXITY; DESIGN; ATTENTION; IMPACT; SHAPE; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; REPETITION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1108/IJRDM-06-2017-0123
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of the symmetrical disposition of information items displayed on the front of product packaging on perceived complexity, perceptual fluency, aesthetic evaluation and product purchase intention. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 104 participants was exposed to fast-moving consumer goods packaging. A within-subject design experiment was carried out to assess the influence of the symmetrical disposition of information items displayed on the front of the packaging. ANOVA and a PROCESS procedure to assess mediation (Hayes, 2013) examined the relationships among the factors influenced by symmetry. Findings This study found that the symmetrical disposition of information items around the vertical axis (mirror symmetry) decreased visual complexity and highlighted an "indirect-only mediation" of visual complexity on the aesthetic evaluation of the packaging through processing fluency. This research also highlighted the fact that packaging aesthetic evaluation had a positive influence on purchase intention. Originality/value This study extends knowledge on package design by showing that the elements on which the producer can act (in this case, symmetry on the front of packaging) have an influence on the consumer's evaluation of the product and intention to purchase.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1040
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1920, SOURCE BOOK GESTALT
[2]  
[Anonymous], ERGEBNISSE PHYSL 2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 23 BIENNIAL C INT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1967, Psychon. Sci.
[5]  
ATTNEAVE F, 1955, Am J Psychol, V68, P209, DOI 10.2307/1418892
[6]   PHYSICAL DETERMINANTS OF THE JUDGED COMPLEXITY OF SHAPES [J].
ATTNEAVE, F .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 53 (04) :221-227
[7]   IMPACT OF PHYSICALLY ATTRACTIVE MODELS ON ADVERTISING EVALUATIONS [J].
BAKER, MJ ;
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (04) :538-555
[8]  
Batra R., 2016, PSYCHOL DESIGN CREAT
[9]  
Berkowitz Marvin., 1987, Advances in Consumer Research, V14, P559
[10]  
Berlyne D.E., 1971, AESTHETICS PSYCHOBIO