Biomarker Panel for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

被引:106
|
作者
Yu, Jeffrey [1 ]
Storer, Barry E. [2 ,3 ]
Kushekhar, Kushi [1 ]
Abu Zaid, Mohammad [1 ]
Zhang, Qing [2 ]
Gafken, Philip R. [2 ]
Ogata, Yuko [2 ]
Martin, Paul J. [2 ]
Flowers, Mary E. [2 ]
Hansen, John A. [2 ]
Arora, Mukta [4 ]
Cutler, Corey [5 ]
Jagasia, Madan [6 ]
Pidala, Joseph [7 ]
Hamilton, Betty K. [8 ]
Chen, George L. [9 ]
Pusic, Iskra [10 ]
Lee, Stephanie J. [2 ]
Paczesny, Sophie [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[7] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[8] Cleveland Clin Fdn, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[9] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[10] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; WORKING GROUP-REPORT; BLOOD STEM-CELLS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CHRONIC GVHD; BONE-MARROW; T-CELLS; RISK-FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9615
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To identify diagnostic and prognostic markers of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), the major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Patients and Methods Using a quantitative proteomics approach, we compared pooled plasma samples obtained at matched time points after HCT (median, 103 days) from 35 patients with cGVHD and 18 without cGVHD (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD002762). Of 105 proteins showing at least a 1.25-fold difference in expression, 22 were selected on the basis of involvement in relevant pathways and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay availability. Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) and suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) also were measured on the basis of previously determined associations with GVHD. Concentrations of the four lead biomarkers were measured at or after diagnosis in plasma from two independent verification cohorts (n = 391) to determine their association with cGVHD. Their prognostic ability when measured at approximately day + 100 after HCT was evaluated in plasma of a second verification cohort (n = 172). Results Of 24 proteins measured in the first verification cohort, nine proteins were associated with cGVHD, and only four (ST2, CXCL9, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and osteopontin) were necessary to compose a four-biomarker panel with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.89 and significant correlation with cGVHD diagnosis, cGVHD severity, and nonrelapse mortality. In a second verification cohort, this panel distinguished patients with cGVHD (AUC, 0.75), and finally, the panel measured at day + 100 could predict cGVHD occurring within the next 3 months with an AUC of 0.67 and 0.79 without and with known clinical risk factors, respectively. Conclusion We conclude that the biomarker panel measured at diagnosis or day + 100 after HCT may allow patient stratification according to risk of cGVHD. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:2583 / U57
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A biomarker panel associated with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Ahmed, S.
    El-Gezawy, E.
    Holler, E.
    Collins, M.
    Jackson, G.
    Dickinson, A.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 45 : S120 - S120
  • [2] A biomarker panel for acute graft-versus-host disease
    Paczesny, Sophie
    Krijanovski, Oleg I.
    Braun, Thomas M.
    Choi, Sung W.
    Clouthier, Shawn G.
    Kuick, Rork
    Misek, David E.
    Cooke, Kenneth R.
    Kitko, Carrie L.
    Weyand, Angela
    Bickley, Daniel
    Jones, Dawn
    Whitfield, Joel
    Reddy, Pavan
    Levine, John E.
    Hanash, Samir M.
    Ferrara, James L. M.
    BLOOD, 2009, 113 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [3] A five biomarker panel predicts acute graft-versus-host disease
    Paczesny, S.
    Bickley, D.
    Choi, S.
    Crawford, J.
    Braun, T.
    Pitteri, S.
    Hogan, J.
    Reddy, P.
    Hanash, S.
    Ferrara, J.
    Levine, J.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 45 : S2 - S2
  • [4] Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Biomarker Discovery and Replication
    Schultz, K. R. R.
    Kariminia, A.
    Ivison, S.
    Holton, S. G.
    Hebert, M. -J.
    Flowers, M. E.
    Martin, P.
    Rozmus, J.
    Subrt, P.
    Storer, B.
    Lee, S. J.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 50 : S182 - S182
  • [5] Prediction of graft-versus-host disease: a biomarker panel based on lymphocytes and cytokines
    Budde, Holger
    Papert, Susanne
    Maas, Jens-Holger
    Reichardt, Holger M.
    Wulf, Gerald
    Hasenkamp, Justin
    Riggert, Joachim
    Legler, Tobias J.
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 96 (07) : 1127 - 1133
  • [6] Prediction of graft-versus-host disease: a biomarker panel based on lymphocytes and cytokines
    Holger Budde
    Susanne Papert
    Jens-Holger Maas
    Holger M. Reichardt
    Gerald Wulf
    Justin Hasenkamp
    Joachim Riggert
    Tobias J. Legler
    Annals of Hematology, 2017, 96 : 1127 - 1133
  • [7] A new biomarker for graft-versus-host disease
    Burki, Talha Khan
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (10): : E395 - E395
  • [8] Chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Rorvik, Synne Dragesund
    Abrahamsen, Ingerid Weum
    Myhre, Anders Eivind
    Vo, Camilla Dao
    Odegaard, Eva Meling
    Bruserud, Oystein
    Gedde-Dahl, Tobias
    Tvedt, Tor Henrik Anderson
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2023, 143 (04) : 337 - 341
  • [9] Chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Bolanos-Meade, Javier
    Vogelsang, Georgia B.
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2008, 14 (20) : 1974 - 1986
  • [10] Chronic graft-versus-host disease
    Galbizo, Ellaine
    Williams, Lori A.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2006, 33 (05) : 881 - 883