Effect of Standardized, Patient-Centered Label Instructions to Improve Comprehension of Prescription Drug Use

被引:88
作者
Wolf, Michael S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Davis, Terry C. [4 ,5 ]
Curtis, Laura M. [1 ]
Webb, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Bailey, Stacy Cooper [1 ,2 ]
Shrank, William H. [6 ]
Lindquist, Lee [1 ,2 ]
Ruo, Bernice [1 ,2 ]
Bocchini, Mary V. [4 ,5 ]
Parker, Ruth M. [7 ]
Wood, Alastair J. J. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Div Gen Internal Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Hlth Literacy & Learning Program, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Learning Sci, Sch Educ & Social Policy, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr Shreveport, Dept Med, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr Shreveport, Dept Pediat, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon,Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] Symphony Capital LLC, New York, NY USA
[9] Weill Cornell Med Sch, New York, NY USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
prescription; medication; comprehension; patient; labels; safety; health literacy; LITERACY; ADULTS; OLDER; VARIABILITY; INFORMATION; ADHERENCE; QUALITY; MEMORY; ICONS; YOUNG;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f38174
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of standardized, patient-centered label (PCL) instructions to improve comprehension of prescription drug use compared with typical instructions. Methods: A total of 500 adult patients recruited from 2 academic and 2 community primary care clinics in Chicago, IL and Shreveport, LA were assigned to receive as follows: (1) standard prescription instructions written as times per day (once, twice 3 times per day) (usual care), (2) PCL instructions that specify explicit timing with standard intervals (morning, noon, evening, bedtime) (PCL), or (3) PCL instructions with a graphic aid to visually depict dose and timing of the medication (PCL + Graphic). The outcome was correct interpretation of label instructions. Results: Instructions with the PCL format were more likely to be correctly interpreted compared with standard instructions (adjusted relative risk [RR] : 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] : 1.25-1.41). Inclusion of the graphic aid (PCL + Graphic) decreased rates of correct interpretation compared with PCL instructions alone (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). Patients with low literacy were better able to interpret PCL instructions (low literacy: RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.14 -1.68; P = 0.001). Conclusion: The PCL approach could improve patients' understanding and use of their medication regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 100
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) R01 HS017687-01, R01HS01768701 AHRQ
[2]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) R01 HS019435-01, R01HS01943501 AHRQ
[3]  
*AM SOC HLTH SYST, 1997, ASHP GUID PHARM COND, P192
[4]  
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2004, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
[5]  
American Medical Association, 2008, HLTH LIT PAT SAF HEL
[6]  
American Pharmacists Association, 2002, COMM POL REP HLTH LI
[7]  
[Anonymous], PREVENTING MED ERROR
[8]  
[Anonymous], FIN REP KEYST NAT PO
[9]  
Bailey Stacy Cooper, 2009, Med Care, V47, P707, DOI 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318195fd02
[10]   Comparison of Handwritten and Electronically Generated Prescription Drug Instructions [J].
Bailey, Stacy Cooper ;
Persell, Stephen D. ;
Jacobson, Kara L. ;
Parker, Ruth M. ;
Wolf, Michael S. .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 43 (01) :151-152