Is more supply chain integration always beneficial to financial performance?

被引:100
作者
Zhao, Gang [1 ]
Feng, Taiwen [2 ]
Wang, Dan [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Management, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Management, Melbourne, Vic 3145, Australia
关键词
Supply chain integration; Top management support; Performance; China; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; EXTERNAL INTEGRATION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CUSTOMER INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; INNOVATION; STRATEGY; IMPACT; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While most studies argue that supply chain integration (SCI) has positive effect on financial performance, some literature cautions that SCI may impair financial performance under certain conditions. Our research extends this research stream by considering the adverse effect of SCI. In this study, we examine how supplier integration, internal integration and customer integration contribute to or impede firms' financial performance and investigate the complementary roles of top management support in this process combining the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Our findings from a survey of 195 firms in China indicate both favorable and adverse effects of SCI by showing an inverted U-shaped relationship between SCI and financial performance. Thus, either too little or too much SCI can impair financial performance. In addition, top management support can be considered as a complementary asset to SCI. This finding suggests that firms should focus on the important roles of top management support so as to improve financial performance through SCI more effectively. This study opens up new research avenues for SCI and suggests directions for future research and practice by exploring under what conditions SCI can help to improve financial performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 172
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   Logistics-production, logistics-marketing and external integration - Their impact on performance [J].
Gimenez, C ;
Ventura, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (01) :20-38
[33]   The dark side of information and market efficiency in E-markets [J].
Grover, Varun ;
Lim, Jaejoo ;
Ayyagari, Ramakrishna .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2006, 37 (03) :297-324
[34]   Information systems in supply chain integration and management [J].
Gunasekaran, A ;
Ngai, EWT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 159 (02) :269-295
[35]   Involving suppliers in new product development [J].
Handfield, RB ;
Ragatz, GL ;
Petersen, KJ ;
Monczka, RM .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 42 (01) :59-+
[36]  
Hertz S., 2001, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V4, P237, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13675560110060009, 10.1080/13675560110060009]
[37]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[38]   The impact of supply chain integration on company performance: an organizational capability perspective [J].
Huo, Baofeng .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2012, 17 (06) :596-610
[39]   Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance [J].
Kim, Soo Wook .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2006, 11 (03) :241-248
[40]   An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance [J].
Kim, Soo Wook .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 119 (02) :328-346