Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider

被引：196
作者：
Dettori, Joseph R. [1 ]
Norvell, Daniel C. [1 ]
Chapman, Jens R. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Spectrum Res Inc, Box 88998, Steilacoom, WA 98388 USA
[2] Swedish Neurosci Inst, Seattle, WA USA
来源：
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1177/21925682221110527
中图分类号：
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1624 / 1626
页数：3
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
    Borenstein, Michael
    Hedges, Larry V.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Rothstein, Hannah R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [2] Seeing the Forest by Looking at the Trees: How to Interpret a Meta-Analysis Forest Plot
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Chapman, Jens R.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (04) : 614 - 616
  • [3] The Risk of Nonunion in Smokers Revisited: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nunna, Ravi S.
    Ostrov, Philip B.
    Ansari, Darius
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Godolias, Periklis
    Elias, Elias
    Tran, Angela
    Oskouian, Rod J.
    Hart, Robert
    Abdul-Jabbar, Amir
    Jackson, Keith L.
    Devine, John G.
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Chapman, Jens R.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (03) : 526 - 539
  • [4] OrthoEvidence, 2019, OE ORIGINAL, V2
1