Evaluation of single vs pooled swab cultures for detecting MRSA colonization

被引:6
作者
Grmek-Kosnik, I. [1 ]
Dermota, U. [1 ]
Ribic, H. [1 ]
Storman, A. [1 ]
Petrovic, Z. [1 ]
Zohar-Cretnik, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lab Hlth Environm & Food, Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
MRSA; Pooling; Detection of colonization; Surveillance cultures; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; SURVEILLANCE; ENRICHMENT; IMPACT; MEDIA; NOSE; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.016
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The costs and laboratory workload arising from meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening could be reduced markedly by processing nose, throat and skin swabs from one person in a single culture broth (specimen pooling). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivities and times for MRSA detection using a variety of approaches to processing of individual and pooled swabs. Methods: Four hundred and seventeen swabs from 139 subjects with a history of MRSA colonization (three swabs per subject - nose, throat and skin) were submitted. Swabs were suspended in 200-mu L sterile saline, and these suspensions were used individually and as pooled samples to inoculate two different chromogenic media [MRSA SMART (bio-Merieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, Paris, France) and CHROMagar MRSA (CHROMagar, Paris, France)] and Todd-Hewitt Broth; the latter cultures were then subcultured on to the same chromogenic media. Results: MRSA was detected from at least one specimen in 75 subjects (50.4%). The diagnostic sensitivities of pooled surveillance cultures compared with single cultures were 97% and 93% for direct and enrichment cultures, respectively. Enrichment culture of either individual or pooled samples had no benefit compared with direct culture (P>0.05). Conclusions: Pooling of MRSA screening swabs for either direct culture on chromogenic agar or enrichment culture is suitable for routine use. (C) 2017 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREAKP TABL INT MICS
[2]   MRSA screening: throat swabs are better than nose swabs [J].
Bignardi, G. E. ;
Lowes, S. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2009, 71 (04) :373-374
[3]   Evaluation of four selective agars and two enrichment broths in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Bocher, S. ;
Smyth, R. ;
Kahlmeter, G. ;
Kerremans, J. ;
Vos, M. C. ;
Skov, R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (09) :3136-3138
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016, METH RES STAPH AUR M
[5]   Optimization of multiple muco-cutaneous site sampling method for screening MRSA colonization in ICU [J].
Datta, Priya ;
Vasdeva, Hena Rani ;
Chander, Jagdish .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 17 (04) :243-245
[6]   THE EVALUATION OF MRSA SURVEILLANCE CULTURES BY THE NUMBER AND COMBINATIONS OF ANATOMICAL SITES [J].
Grmek Kosnik, Irena ;
Storman, Alenka ;
Petrovic, Ziva ;
Robnik, Slavica ;
Dermota, Urska ;
Zohar Cretnik, Tjasa .
ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2017, 56 (01) :24-30
[7]   Evaluation of separate vs pooled swab cultures, different media, broth enrichment and anatomical sites of screening for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical specimens [J].
Grmek-Kosnik, I ;
Ihan, A ;
Dermota, U ;
Rems, M ;
Kosnik, M ;
Kolmos, HJ .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2005, 61 (02) :155-161
[8]   The nose is not the only relevant MRSA screening site [J].
Ide, L. ;
Lootens, J. ;
Thibo, P. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2009, 15 (12) :1192-1193
[9]   Dutch guideline on the laboratory detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Kluytmans-van den Bergh, M. F. Q. ;
Vos, M. C. ;
Diederen, B. M. W. ;
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E. ;
Voss, A. ;
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 33 (01) :89-101
[10]  
Lee S, 2008, ANN CLIN LAB SCI, V38, P254