Cross-Cultural Instrument Adaptation and Validation of Health Beliefs About Cancer Screening A Methodological Systematic Review

被引:3
作者
Lei, Fang [1 ]
Chen, Wei-Ti [1 ]
Brecht, Mary-Lynn [1 ]
Zhang, Zuo-Feng [2 ]
Lee, Eunice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Nursing, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Adaptation; Cancer screening; Health beliefs; Instrument; Systematic review; Validation; MODEL SCALE; CERVICAL-CANCER; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; TRANSLATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; VERSION; STATISTICS; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0000000000001007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The uptake of cancer screening is significantly associated with participants' health beliefs about cancer screening. Scales measuring health beliefs of cancer screening are available; however, the scales that were developed and validated for the US population may lack cultural appropriateness, which could compromise the reliability and validity of the scales when applied to different ethnic groups or populations. Objective The aim of this study was to summarize, analyze, and compare the methods used in the cross-cultural instrument adaptation and validation processes of health beliefs about cancer screening. Methods A systematic review design with narrative methods was used. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, were searched. Results A total of 18 articles were eligible. Results showed (1) the translation methods included committee translation and back translation, which were further refined by using professional translators, using professional interpreters and/or involving the first author, using bilingual individuals, and involving bilingual investigators; (2) the modification methods included embedded and afterward modification; and (3) the validation methods included testing construct validity, internal consistency reliability, item-total subscale correlations, test-retest reliability, content validity, predictive validity, and face validity. Conclusions Back translation and afterward modification were most frequently used for translating existing instruments to another language. Validity and reliability were most frequently established by construct validity, content validity, face validity, predictive validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and item-total subscale correlation after instruments were translated. Implications for Practice Clinicians should evaluate the translation and adaptation process for translated versions of instruments before using them to provide culturally appropriate and sensitive care.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 396
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] [Anonymous], Cancer
  • [3] Balci A., 2011, Research Methods, Techniques, and Principles in Social Sciences, V9th
  • [4] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
    Beaton, DE
    Bombardier, C
    Guillemin, F
    Ferraz, MB
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3186 - 3191
  • [5] Bowling A., 2014, Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services, Vfourth
  • [6] A CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION OF A PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGIC INSTRUMENT - THE DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW SCHEDULES ADAPTATION IN PUERTO-RICO
    BRAVO, M
    CANINO, GJ
    RUBIOSTIPEC, M
    WOODBURYFARINA, M
    [J]. CULTURE MEDICINE AND PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 15 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [7] BRINK HI., 1999, Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals, Vsecond
  • [8] Brislin RW., 1986, FIELD METHODS CROSS, P137, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
  • [9] A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Health Belief Model Variables in Predicting Behavior
    Carpenter, Christopher J.
    [J]. HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2010, 25 (08) : 661 - 669
  • [10] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Slaven, James E., II
    Monohan, Patrick
    Rawl, Susan M.
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2017, 40 (03) : 237 - 244