Optimizing humeral stem fixation in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the cement -within -cement technique

被引:5
作者
Gorman, R. Allen, II [1 ]
Christmas, Kaitlyn N. [1 ]
Simon, Peter [1 ]
Hess, A. Vincent, II [1 ]
Brewley, Earl E., Jr. [2 ]
Mighell, Mark A. [2 ]
Frankle, Mark A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Orthopaed Res & Educ, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Florida Orthopaed Inst, 13020 N Telecom Pkwy, Tampa, FL 33637 USA
关键词
Revision; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; cement within cement; cemented; humeral; bone loss; COMPONENT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS; OUTCOMES; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.094
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision reverse shoulder arthro-plasty (RSA) by the cement-within-cement technique, as well as to identify whether surgical technique can affect subsequent humeral loosening. Methods: In 98 patients, cemented humeral components that were revised to RSA using the cement-within-cement technique were identified and included in this study. We compared 8 patients in whom humeral stem loosening developed with 90 patients whose stem remained fixed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs of each patient were downloaded in DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) format and analyzed in Mimics. The total area of the cement mantle (in square millimeters) and of the stem (in square millimeters), as visualized on 2-dimensional plain films, was measured in each subject on both preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Outcomes at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were analyzed. Results: Clinical outcomes were available in 57 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 54 months (range, 21-156 months). Patients demonstrated significantly improved functional outcome scores and shoulder range of motion. In the group without loosening, the mean increase in the cement mantle area was 4380 +/-12701 mm(2) (P < .0001). In the group with loosening, the mean increase in the cement mantle area was only 811 +/- 4014 mm(2) (P = .484). Conclusions: Use of the cement-within-cement technique for fixation of the humeral component in revision RSA is effective in improving functional outcome scores and shoulder range of motion. Furthermore, these findings suggest that efforts to maximize the cement volume during reimplantation may lessen the chance of humeral stem loosening requiring additional revision. Level of evidence: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study (C) 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S9 / S16
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Revision of an unstable hemiarthroplasty or anatomical total shoulder replacement using a reverse design prosthesis
    Abdel, M. P.
    Hattrup, S. J.
    Sperling, J. W.
    Cofield, R. H.
    Kreofsky, C. R.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (05) : 668 - 672
  • [2] Results of a stemless reverse shoulder prosthesis at more than 58 months mean without loosening
    Ballas, Richard
    Beguin, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (09) : E1 - E6
  • [3] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as salvage for failed prior arthroplasty in patients 65 years of age or younger
    Black, Eric M.
    Roberts, Susanne M.
    Siegel, Elana
    Yannopoulos, Paul
    Higgins, Laurence D.
    Warner, Jon J. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (07) : 1036 - 1042
  • [4] Complications and revision of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Boileau, P.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (01) : S33 - S43
  • [5] Revision surgery of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Boileau, Pascal
    Melis, Barbara
    Duperron, David
    Moineau, Gregory
    Rumian, Adam P.
    Han, Yung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (10) : 1359 - 1370
  • [6] Revision Arthroplasty with Use of a Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis-Allograft Composite
    Chacon, Ariel
    Virani, Nazeem
    Shannon, Robert
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    Pupello, Derek
    Frankle, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01) : 119 - 127
  • [7] Revision of the humeral component for aseptic loosening in arthroplasty of the shoulder
    Cil, A.
    Veillette, C. J. H.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J.
    Sperling, J. W.
    Schleck, C.
    Cofield, R. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (01): : 75 - 81
  • [8] Survivorship of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty
    Cil, Akin
    Veillette, Christian J. H.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Sperling, John W.
    Schleck, Cathy D.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [9] Crosby Lynn A, 2015, Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013), V73 Suppl 1, pS136
  • [10] Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening
    Deutsch, Allen
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    Kelly, James
    Mody, Milan
    Norris, Tom
    Ramsey, Matthew L.
    Iannotti, Joseph P.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (06) : 706 - 716