The GFDL CM3 Coupled Climate Model: Characteristics of the Ocean and Sea Ice Simulations

被引:266
|
作者
Griffies, Stephen M. [1 ]
Winton, Michael [1 ]
Donner, Leo J. [1 ]
Horowitz, Larry W. [1 ]
Downes, Stephanie M. [2 ]
Farneti, Riccardo [3 ]
Gnanadesikan, Anand [1 ]
Hurlin, William J. [1 ]
Lee, Hyun-Chul [1 ,4 ]
Liang, Zhi [1 ,4 ]
Palter, Jaime B. [2 ]
Samuels, Bonita L. [1 ]
Wittenberg, Andrew T. [1 ]
Wyman, Bruce L. [1 ]
Yin, Jianjun [5 ]
Zadeh, Niki [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Abdus Salaam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Earth Syst Phys Sect, Trieste, Italy
[4] High Performance Technol Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Geosci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
ANTARCTIC CIRCUMPOLAR CURRENT; THERMOHALINE CIRCULATION; WATER; HEAT; TRANSPORT; ATMOSPHERE; ATLANTIC; VOLUME; DEEP; FLUX;
D O I
10.1175/2011JCLI3964.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper documents time mean simulation characteristics from the ocean and sea ice components in a new coupled climate model developed at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). The GFDL Climate Model version 3 (CM3) is formulated with effectively the same ocean and sea ice components as the earlier CM2.1 yet with extensive developments made to the atmosphere and land model components. Both CM2.1 and CM3 show stable mean climate indices, such as large-scale circulation and sea surface temperatures (SSTs). There are notable improvements in the CM3 climate simulation relative to CM2.1, including a modified SST bias pattern and reduced biases in the Arctic sea ice cover. The authors anticipate SST differences between CM2.1 and CM3 in lower latitudes through analysis of the atmospheric fluxes at the ocean surface in corresponding Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations. In contrast, SST changes in the high latitudes are dominated by ocean and sea ice effects absent in AMIP simulations. The ocean interior simulation in CM3 is generally warmer than in CM2.1, which adversely impacts the interior biases.
引用
收藏
页码:3520 / 3544
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficient Flowline Simulations of Ice Shelf-Ocean Interactions: Sensitivity Studies with a Fully Coupled Model
    Walker, Ryan T.
    Holland, David M.
    Parizek, Byron R.
    Alley, Richard B.
    Nowicki, Sophie M. J.
    Jenkins, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2013, 43 (10) : 2200 - 2210
  • [32] Centennial oscillations in an ocean-ice coupled model
    Jin Xiangze
    Huang Ruixin
    Yang Jiayan
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 1999, 16 (3) : 323 - 342
  • [33] Centennial Oscillations in an Ocean-ice Coupled Model
    金向泽
    黄瑞新
    杨嘉岩
    AdvancesinAtmosphericSciences, 1999, (03) : 323 - 342
  • [34] Limitations of a coupled regional climate model in the reproduction of the observed Arctic sea-ice retreat
    Dorn, W.
    Dethloff, K.
    Rinke, A.
    CRYOSPHERE, 2012, 6 (05) : 985 - 998
  • [35] Centennial oscillations in an ocean-ice coupled model
    Jin, XZ
    Huang, RX
    Yang, JY
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 1999, 16 (03) : 323 - 342
  • [36] Global-to-Regional Nested Grid Climate Simulations in the GFDL High Resolution Atmospheric Model
    Harris, Lucas M.
    Lin, Shian-Jiann
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (13) : 4890 - 4910
  • [37] The Impact of an Intense Cyclone on Short-Term Sea Ice Loss in a Fully Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean-Ice Model
    Stern, Daniel P.
    Doyle, James D.
    Barton, Neil P.
    Finocchio, Peter M.
    Komaromi, William A.
    Metzger, E. Joseph
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (04)
  • [38] Dense shelf water formation process in the Sea of Okhotsk based on an ice-ocean coupled model
    Fujisaki, Ayumi
    Mitsudera, Humio
    Yamaguchi, Hajime
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2011, 116
  • [39] An Evaluation of the Ocean and Sea Ice Climate of E3SM Using MPAS and Interannual CORE-II Forcing
    Petersen, Mark R.
    Asay-Davis, Xylar S.
    Berres, Anne S.
    Chen, Qingshan
    Feige, Nils
    Hoffman, Matthew J.
    Jacobsen, Douglas W.
    Jones, Philip W.
    Maltrud, Mathew E.
    Price, Stephen F.
    Ringler, Todd D.
    Streletz, Gregory J.
    Turner, Adrian K.
    Van Roekel, Luke P.
    Veneziani, Milena
    Wolfe, Jonathan D.
    Wolfram, Phillip J.
    Woodring, Jonathan L.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (05) : 1438 - 1458
  • [40] Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations
    Kirtman, Ben P.
    Bitz, Cecilia
    Bryan, Frank
    Collins, William
    Dennis, John
    Hearn, Nathan
    Kinter, James L., III
    Loft, Richard
    Rousset, Clement
    Siqueira, Leo
    Stan, Cristiana
    Tomas, Robert
    Vertenstein, Mariana
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 1303 - 1328