The GFDL CM3 Coupled Climate Model: Characteristics of the Ocean and Sea Ice Simulations

被引:266
|
作者
Griffies, Stephen M. [1 ]
Winton, Michael [1 ]
Donner, Leo J. [1 ]
Horowitz, Larry W. [1 ]
Downes, Stephanie M. [2 ]
Farneti, Riccardo [3 ]
Gnanadesikan, Anand [1 ]
Hurlin, William J. [1 ]
Lee, Hyun-Chul [1 ,4 ]
Liang, Zhi [1 ,4 ]
Palter, Jaime B. [2 ]
Samuels, Bonita L. [1 ]
Wittenberg, Andrew T. [1 ]
Wyman, Bruce L. [1 ]
Yin, Jianjun [5 ]
Zadeh, Niki [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Abdus Salaam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Earth Syst Phys Sect, Trieste, Italy
[4] High Performance Technol Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Dept Geosci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
ANTARCTIC CIRCUMPOLAR CURRENT; THERMOHALINE CIRCULATION; WATER; HEAT; TRANSPORT; ATMOSPHERE; ATLANTIC; VOLUME; DEEP; FLUX;
D O I
10.1175/2011JCLI3964.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper documents time mean simulation characteristics from the ocean and sea ice components in a new coupled climate model developed at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL). The GFDL Climate Model version 3 (CM3) is formulated with effectively the same ocean and sea ice components as the earlier CM2.1 yet with extensive developments made to the atmosphere and land model components. Both CM2.1 and CM3 show stable mean climate indices, such as large-scale circulation and sea surface temperatures (SSTs). There are notable improvements in the CM3 climate simulation relative to CM2.1, including a modified SST bias pattern and reduced biases in the Arctic sea ice cover. The authors anticipate SST differences between CM2.1 and CM3 in lower latitudes through analysis of the atmospheric fluxes at the ocean surface in corresponding Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations. In contrast, SST changes in the high latitudes are dominated by ocean and sea ice effects absent in AMIP simulations. The ocean interior simulation in CM3 is generally warmer than in CM2.1, which adversely impacts the interior biases.
引用
收藏
页码:3520 / 3544
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulated Climate and Climate Change in the GFDL CM2.5 High-Resolution Coupled Climate Model
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Rosati, Anthony
    Anderson, Whit
    Adcroft, Alistair J.
    Balaji, V.
    Benson, Rusty
    Dixon, Keith
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Lee, Hyun-Chul
    Pacanowski, Ronald C.
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Zeng, Fanrong
    Zhang, Rong
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (08) : 2755 - 2781
  • [2] The Sensitivity of a Coupled Climate Model to Its Ocean Component
    Megann, A. P.
    New, A. L.
    Blaker, A. T.
    Sinha, B.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2010, 23 (19) : 5126 - 5150
  • [3] ACCESS-OM: the ocean and sea-ice core of the ACCESS coupled model
    Bi, Daohua
    Marsland, Simon J.
    Uotila, Petteri
    O'Farrell, Siobhan
    Fiedler, Russell
    Sullivan, Arnold
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Zhou, Xiaobing
    Hirst, Anthony C.
    AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2013, 63 (01) : 213 - 232
  • [4] The GFDL Global Ocean and Sea Ice Model OM4.0: Model Description and Simulation Features
    Adcroft, Alistair
    Anderson, Whit
    Balaji, V.
    Blanton, Chris
    Bushuk, Mitchell
    Dufour, Carolina O.
    Dunne, John P.
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Hallberg, Robert
    Harrison, Matthew J.
    Held, Isaac M.
    Jansen, Malte F.
    John, Jasmin G.
    Krasting, John P.
    Langenhorst, Amy R.
    Legg, Sonya
    Liang, Zhi
    McHugh, Colleen
    Radhakrishnan, Aparna
    Reichl, Brandon G.
    Rosati, Tony
    Samuels, Bonita L.
    Shao, Andrew
    Stouffer, Ronald
    Winton, Michael
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Xiang, Baoqiang
    Zadeh, Niki
    Zhang, Rong
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (10) : 3167 - 3211
  • [5] A comparison of climate change simulations produced by two GFDL coupled climate models
    Dixon, KW
    Delworth, TL
    Knutson, TR
    Spelman, MJ
    Stouffer, RJ
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2003, 37 (1-2) : 81 - 102
  • [6] Impact of Assimilation of Sea-Ice Surface Temperatures on a Coupled Ocean and Sea-Ice Model
    Rasmussen, Till A. S.
    Hoyer, Jacob L.
    Ghent, Darren
    Bulgin, Claire E.
    Dybkjaer, Gorm
    Ribergaard, Mads H.
    Nielsen-Englyst, Pia
    Madsen, Kristine S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2018, 123 (04) : 2440 - 2460
  • [7] Assimilating synthetic CryoSat sea ice thickness in a coupled ice-ocean model
    Lisaeter, K. A.
    Evensen, G.
    Laxon, S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2007, 112 (C7)
  • [8] Estimating Decadal Predictability for the Southern Ocean Using the GFDL CM2.1 Model
    Zhang, Liping
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Yang, Xiaosong
    Gudgel, Richard G.
    Jia, Liwei
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    Zeng, Fanrong
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (14) : 5187 - 5203
  • [9] Understanding the influence of ocean waves on Arctic sea ice simulation: a modeling study with an atmosphere-ocean-wave-sea ice coupled model
    Yang, Chao-Yuan
    Liu, Jiping
    Chen, Dake
    CRYOSPHERE, 2024, 18 (03) : 1215 - 1239
  • [10] Arctic sea ice and freshwater changes driven by the atmospheric leading mode in a coupled sea ice-ocean model
    Zhang, XD
    Ikeda, M
    Walsh, JE
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2003, 16 (13) : 2159 - 2177