Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China

被引:148
作者
Li, Jie [1 ]
Feldman, Marcus W. [2 ,3 ]
Li, Shuzhuo [1 ]
Daily, Gretchen C. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Inst Populat & Dev Studies, Xian 710049, Shaanxi Prov, Peoples R China
[2] Stanford Univ, Morrison Inst Populat & Resource Studies, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst, Nat Capital Project, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
conservation and development; Gini coefficient decomposition; livelihood strategies; nonfarm labor; PAYMENTS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1101018108
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs proliferate globally, assessing their impact upon households' income and livelihood patterns is critical. The Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) is an exceptional PES program, in terms of its ambitious biophysical and socioeconomic objectives, large geographic scale, numbers of people directly affected, and duration of operation. The SLCP has now operated in the poor mountainous areas in China for 10 y and offers a unique opportunity for policy evaluation. Using survey data on rural households' livelihoods in the southern mountain area in Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province, we carry out a statistical analysis of the effects of PES and other factors on rural household income. We analyze the extent of income inequality and compare the socio-demographic features and household income of households participating in the SLCP with those that did not. Our statistical analysis shows that participation in SLCP has significant positive impacts upon household income, especially for low-and medium-income households; however, participation also has some negative impacts on the low-and medium-income households. Overall, income inequality is less among households participating in the SLCP than among those that do not after 7 y of the PES program. Different income sources have different effects on Gini statistics; in particular, wage income has opposite effects on income inequality for the participating and nonparticipating households. We find, however, that the SLCP has not increased the transfer of labor toward nonfarming activities in the survey site, as the government expected.
引用
收藏
页码:7721 / 7726
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING AS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, SELLING FOREST ENV S
  • [4] CHEN GJ, 2004, CHIN WATER LAND RETE, V2, P48
  • [5] Ecology -: The value of nature and the nature of value
    Daily, GC
    Söderqvist, T
    Aniyar, S
    Arrow, K
    Dasgupta, P
    Ehrlich, PR
    Folke, C
    Jansson, A
    Jansson, BO
    Kautsky, N
    Levin, S
    Lubchenco, J
    Mäler, KG
    Simpson, D
    Starrett, D
    Tilman, D
    Walker, B
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5478) : 395 - 396
  • [6] Nature's role in sustaining economic development
    Dasgupta, Partha
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1537) : 5 - 11
  • [7] Ellis F., 2000, RURAL LIVELIHOODS DI
  • [8] FAN XS, 2008, CHIN RURAL EC, V3, P23
  • [9] GAO MT, 2005, EC RES, V12, P35
  • [10] How Sustainable are Sustainable Development Programs? The Case of the Sloping Land Conversion Program in China
    Grosjean, Pauline
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 37 (01) : 268 - 285