Empirical software engineering: From discipline to interdiscipline

被引:20
作者
Fernandez, Daniel Mendez [1 ]
Passoth, Jan-Hendrik [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Software & Syst Engn, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Munich Ctr Technol Soc, Munich, Germany
关键词
Empirical software engineering; Interdisciplinary research; Symmetrical collaboration; Science & technology studies; GENERAL-THEORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.019
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Empirical software engineering has received much attention in recent years and coined the shift from a more design-science-driven engineering discipline to an insight-oriented, and theory-centric one. Yet, we still face many challenges, among which some increase the need for interdisciplinary research. This is especially true for the investigation of social, cultural and human-centric aspects of software engineering. Although we can already observe an increased recognition of the need for more interdisciplinary research in (empirical) software engineering, such research configurations come with challenges barely discussed from a scientific point of view. In this position paper, we critically reflect upon the epistemological setting of empirical software engineering and elaborate its configuration as an Interdiscipline. In particular, we (1) elaborate a pragmatic view on empirical research for software engineering reflecting a cyclic process for knowledge creation, (2) motivate a path towards symmetrical interdisciplinary research, and (3) adopt five rules of thumb from other interdisciplinary collaborations in our field before concluding with new emerging challenges. This supports to elevate empirical software engineering from a developing discipline moving towards a paradigmatic stage of normal science to one that configures interdisciplinary teams and research methods symmetrically. (C)2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 179
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, NATURE SCI SCI ED, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-306-47215-5_5
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, P 26 INT C SOFTW ENG
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU
  • [4] Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations
    Balmer, Andrew S.
    Calvert, Jane
    Marris, Claire
    Molyneux-Hodgson, Susan
    Frow, Emma
    Kearnes, Matthew
    Bulpin, Kate
    Schyfter, Pablo
    Mackenzie, Adrian
    Martin, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2016, 3 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [5] Basili V. R., 2013, PERSPECTIVES FUTURE, P255, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-37395-4_17
  • [6] Bloor D., 1976, KNOWLEDGE SOCIAL IMA
  • [7] Bogner A., 2010, INTER TRANSDISZIPLIN, P7, DOI 10.5771/9783845221373-7
  • [8] Bossavit L, 2015, LEPRECHAUNS SOFTWARE
  • [9] The Case for Context-Driven Software Engineering Research Generalizability Is Overrated
    Briand, Lionel
    Bianculli, Domenico
    Nejati, Shiva
    Pastore, Fabrizio
    Sabetzadeh, Mehrdad
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 2017, 34 (05) : 72 - 75
  • [10] Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse collaboration
    Brown, Rebekah R.
    Deletic, Ana
    Wong, Tony H. F.
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 525 (7569) : 315 - 317