Antibacterial effects of brand-name teicoplanin and generic products against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

被引:11
作者
Fujimura, Shigeru [1 ]
Fuse, Katsuhiro [1 ,2 ]
Takane, Hidenari [1 ]
Nakano, Yoshihisa [1 ]
Gomi, Kazunori [2 ]
Kikuchi, Toshiaki [2 ]
Watanabe, Akira [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Res Div Dev Antiinfect Agents, Inst Dev Aging & Canc, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808575, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Sch Med, Dept Resp Oncol & Mol Med, Sendai, Miyagi 9808575, Japan
关键词
Generic drug; Teicoplanin; AUC; PK-PD; VANCOMYCIN;
D O I
10.1007/s10156-010-0094-0
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Glycopeptide antibiotics, such as vancomycin and teicoplanin, have been used worldwide to treat infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Generic teicoplanin products were manufactured by many companies in 2009. We investigated the susceptibility of 147 MRSA strains to brand-name teicoplanin (TEIC-1) and seven generic products (TEIC-2 to TEIC-8). The MIC(90) of generic TEIC-5 and TEIC-7 was 8 mu g/ml whereas that of TEIC-1 and other generic products was 4 mu g/ml. The potency equivalent of generic TEIC-5 and TEIC-7 was lower than that of TEIC-1, and TEIC content (%) per potency equivalent (200 mg) in a vial of these two generic products varied greatly compared with the other products. Although the potency equivalent of the TEIC used in this study was within the range stipulated in the Japanese Pharmacopeia, these results showed that the potency equivalent and susceptibility of two of the seven generic products differed from that of TEIC-1. The predicted AUC(0-72) value of those two generic products was 84-85% in comparison with that of TEIC-1. Among generic drugs, there may be products whose antimicrobial effect is not equal to that of the brand teicoplanin.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 33
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, M100S19 CLIN LAB STA
  • [2] Vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to manufactured generic drugs compared with the brand vancomycin
    Fujimura, Shigeru
    Watanabe, Akira
    Fuse, Katsuhiro
    Kikuchi, Toshiaki
    Gomi, Kazunori
    Tokue, Yutaka
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2008, 31 (04) : 391 - 392
  • [3] *JAP ANT RES ASS, 2000, TEICOPLANIN INJECTIO, P39
  • [4] Pharmacodynamic comparison of linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected from hospitals in Brazil
    Kuti, J. L.
    Kiffer, C. R. V.
    Mendes, C. M. F.
    Nicolau, D. P.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2008, 14 (02) : 116 - 123
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of empirical prescribing of antimicrobials in community-acquired pneumonia in three countries in the presence of resistance
    Martin, Monique
    Quilici, Sibilia
    File, Thomas
    Garau, Javier
    Kureishi, Amar
    Kubin, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 59 (05) : 977 - 989
  • [6] Incidence of postoperative infections in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis with original and generic cefuroxime
    Mastoraki, Ekaterini
    Michalopoulos, Argyris
    Kriaras, Loannis
    Mouchtouri, Ero
    Falagas, Matthew
    Karatza, Dimitra
    Geroulanos, Stefanos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2008, 56 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [7] *MIN HLTH LAB WEL, 2006, TEICOPLANIN JAPANESE, P733
  • [8] Nakayama K., 2006, JPN J CHEMOTHER, V54, P1, DOI [10.11250/chemotherapy1995.54.1, DOI 10.11250/CHEMOTHERAPY1995.54.1]
  • [9] Potential therapeutic failure of generic vancomycin in a liver transplant patient with MRSA peritonitis and bacteremia
    Rodriguez, Carlos A.
    Agudelo, Maria
    Catano, Juan C.
    Zuluaga, Andres F.
    Vesga, Omar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2009, 59 (04) : 277 - 280
  • [10] Predicting the clinical efficacy of generic formulations of ceftriaxone
    Schito, GC
    Keenan, MHJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 17 : 33 - 40