Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring of Anticancer Drugs in Hematology Department

被引:0
|
作者
Roohi, Ghazal [1 ]
Selvam, Panner R. [1 ]
Najari, Fares [2 ]
机构
[1] Rajiv Gandhi Univ Hlth Sci, T John Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Legal Med, Fac Med, Tehran, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY AND FORENSIC MEDICINE | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
Adverse drug reaction; Anticancer agents; Active surveillance; Acute Leukemic Leukemia;
D O I
10.32598/ijmtfm.v11i3.32776
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Background: Cancer is among the leading causes of mortality in India. Studies have reported antineoplastic agents as the common class of drugs causing Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs). The present study aimed to conduct active surveillance of ADRs of anticancer drugs in the hematology department. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in 136 patients with cancer and the incidence and frequency of ADRs were assessed. The study was conducted in 6 months in a multispecialty hospital. Results: Among 136 cancer patients, All was more prevalent (39.70%); CLL, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma were less prevalent (0.73%). ADRs were more prevalent in the Pediatrics department, i.e., 18.53% of ADRs were observed in patients aged <10 years. ADRs in male patients constituted 54.39%, whereas it was 45.60% in female patients. Cytarabine caused the highest number of ADRs (34.48%). The most prevalent ADR was anemia (25.60%). Conclusion: Multiple ADRs were detected in cancer patients. We found that hematological ADRs were more prevalent. Most of the ADRs were possible reactions according to Naranjo and the World Health Organization (WHO) scales
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Adverse drug reaction monitoring: support for pharmacovigilance at a tertiary care hospital in Northern Brazil
    Alves de Araujo Lobo, Marcia Germana
    Botelho Pinheiro, Sandra Maria
    Diaz Castro, Jose Gerley
    Momente, Valeria Gomes
    Pranchevicius, Maria-Cristina S.
    BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 14
  • [23] Adverse drug reaction monitoring: support for pharmacovigilance at a tertiary care hospital in Northern Brazil
    Márcia Germana Alves de Araújo Lobo
    Sandra Maria Botelho Pinheiro
    José Gerley Díaz Castro
    Valéria Gomes Momenté
    Maria-Cristina S Pranchevicius
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 14
  • [24] Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic predictor in emergency department patients with cutaneous adverse drug reaction
    Dundar, Zerrin Defne
    Daye, Munise
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 47 : 279 - 283
  • [25] Severe adverse drug reaction to allopurinol
    Lucas, Grace
    Luke, Droney
    AUSTRALIAN PRESCRIBER, 2022, 45 (04) : 130 - 131
  • [26] Levetiracetam Adverse Drug Reaction: Pancytopenia
    Gohil, Jayendra R.
    Agarwal, Tushar S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROSCIENCES, 2018, 13 (01) : 116 - 117
  • [27] Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in emergency department practice
    De Andres Lazaro, Ana Maria
    Sevilla Sanchez, Daniel
    Ortega Romero, Maria del Mar
    Codina Jane, Carles
    Ribas Sala, Josep
    Sanchez Sanchez, Miquel
    EMERGENCIAS, 2013, 25 (05): : 361 - 367
  • [28] A prospective study of adverse drug reactions in a dermatology department
    Ganeva, M.
    Gancheva, T.
    Lazarova, R.
    Tzvetanova, Y.
    Hristakieva, E.
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 29 (02): : 107 - 112
  • [29] Representativeness of diabetes patients participating in a web-based adverse drug reaction monitoring system
    Harmark, Linda
    Alberts, Susanne
    van Puijenbroek, Eugene
    Denig, Petra
    van Grootheest, Kees
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 (03) : 250 - 255
  • [30] An evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction monitoring at a tertiary care teaching hospital
    Gohil, Jaydipsinh B.
    Desai, Chetna K.
    Panchal, Jigar R.
    Patel, Rajnish R.
    Rathod, Gunvant H.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 54 (01) : 19 - 23