Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: Do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist?

被引:31
作者
D'Orsi, C
Tu, SP
Nakano, C
Carney, PA
Abraham, LA
Taplin, SH
Hendrick, RE
Cutter, GR
Berns, E
Barlow, WE
Elmore, JG
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Hanover, NH USA
[4] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Lebanon, NH USA
[5] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Lynn Sage Comprehens Breast Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[7] Univ Alabama, Dept Biostat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[8] Canc Res & Biostat, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2352040132
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the current (2001-2002) capacity of community-based mammography facilities to deliver screening and diagnostic services in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approvals and patient consent were obtained. A mailed survey was sent to 53 eligible mammography facilities in three states (Washington, New Hampshire, and Colorado). Survey questions assessed equipment and staffing availability, as well as appointment waiting times for screening and diagnostic mammography services. Criterion-related content and construct validity were obtained first by means of a national advisory committee of academic, scientific, and clinical colleagues in mammography that reviewed literature on existing surveys and second by pilot testing a series of draft surveys among community mammography facilities not inclusive of the study facilities. The final survey results were independently double entered into a relational database with programmed data checks. The data were sent encrypted by means of file transfer protocol to a central analytical center at Group Health Cooperative. A two-sided P value with alpha = .05 was considered to show statistical significance in all analyses. RESULTS: Forty-five of 53 eligible mammography facilities (85%) returned the survey. Shortages of radiologists relative to the mammographic volume were found in 44% of mammography facilities overall, with shortages of radiologists higher in not-for-profit versus for-profit facilities (60% vs 28% reported). Shortages of Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified technologists were reported by 20% of facilities, with 46% reporting some level of difficulty in maintaining qualified technologists. Waiting times for diagnostic mammography ranged from less than I week to 4 weeks, with 85% performed within I week. Waiting times for screening mammography ranged from less than 1 week to 8 weeks, with 59% performed between 1 week and 4 weeks. Waiting times for both diagnostic and screening services were two to three times higher in high-volume compared with low-volume facilities. CONCLUSION: Survey results show shortages of radiologists and certified mammography technologists. (C) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 395
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
*AM HOSP ASS, 2001, WORKSF SURV 2001
[2]  
*AM REG RAD TECHN, 2001, ANN REP EX RES 2001, P1
[3]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[4]   Survey of radiology residents: Breast imaging training and attitudes [J].
Bassett, LW ;
Monsees, BS ;
Smith, RA ;
Wang, L ;
Hooshi, P ;
Farria, DM ;
Sayre, JW ;
Feig, SA ;
Jackson, VP .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) :862-869
[5]   The new hampshire mammography network: The development and design of a population-based registry [J].
Carney, PA ;
Poplack, SP ;
Wells, WA ;
Littenberg, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (02) :367-372
[6]   A CLINICALLY EFFECTIVE BREAST-CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAM CAN BE COST-EFFECTIVE, TOO [J].
CARTER, AP ;
THOMPSON, RS ;
BOURDEAU, RV ;
ANDENES, J ;
MUSTIN, H ;
STRALEY, H .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (01) :19-34
[7]   Economic challenges in breast imaging - A survivor's guide to success [J].
Feig, SA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (04) :843-+
[8]  
Gorman C, 2001, Time, V157, P81
[9]  
GORMAN C, 2001, TIME, V157, P78
[10]  
Jones D N, 2002, Australas Radiol, V46, P231, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2002.01051.x