External validation of a time-lapse prediction model

被引:60
作者
Freour, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Le Fleuter, Nicolas [1 ,3 ]
Lammers, Jenna [1 ,2 ]
Splingart, Carole [1 ]
Reignier, Arnaud [1 ,2 ]
Barriere, Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHU Nantes, Serv Med & Biol Dev & Reprod, F-44093 Nantes, France
[2] INSERM, UMR1064, Nantes, France
[3] Ctr AMP Procrealis, La Roche Sur Yon, France
关键词
External validation; implantation; time-lapse; prediction model; SINGLE-BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; CLEAVAGE-STAGE EMBRYOS; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; IVF SUCCESS; CULTURE-MEDIA; LIVE BIRTH; MORPHOLOGY; SELECTION; IMPLANTATION; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.111
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the performance of a previously published implantation prediction model based on morphokinetics in a different setting, in an unselected population and with various embryo transfer strategies. Design: Retrospective monocentric study. Setting: University-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) center. Patient(s): 450 unselected couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle with embryo culture in the EmbryoScope (Unisense Fertilitech), corresponding to 528 embryos with known implantation. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates (IR) in embryo categories defined by the model in the overall population and in subgroups according to the day of embryo transfer. Result(s): The distribution of IR among detailed morphokinetic categories in the overall population and in subgroups according to the day of embryo transfer was more heterogeneous than expected according to the published model. The distribution corresponded better to the original when a simplified version of the model was used, although it worked better in the cleavage-stage group than in the blastocyst-stage group. Conclusion(s): This study was unsuccessful in replicating the sensitivity of the previously published model for predicting implantation rate of embryos ranked according to morphokinetic categories. Further work is required to assess the utility of the model for embryo selection. Each team using time-lapse technology should build a center-specific prediction model based on its own data and transfer policy. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 922
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer [J].
Ahlstrom, A. ;
Westin, C. ;
Reismer, E. ;
Wikland, M. ;
Hardarson, T. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (12) :3289-3296
[2]   Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes [J].
Basile, Natalia ;
Morbeck, Dean ;
Garcia-Velasco, Juan ;
Bronet, Fernando ;
Meseguer, Marcos .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (03) :634-641
[3]  
Best L, 2013, HUM REPROD S1, V28, pi87
[4]   Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media-a sibling oocyte study [J].
Ciray, Haydar Nadir ;
Aksoy, Turan ;
Goktas, Cihan ;
Ozturk, Bilgen ;
Bahceci, Mustafa .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2012, 29 (09) :891-900
[5]   External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
de Groot, Joris A. ;
Dutton, Susan ;
Omar, Omar ;
Shanyinde, Milensu ;
Tajar, Abdelouahid ;
Voysey, Merryn ;
Wharton, Rose ;
Yu, Ly-Mee ;
Moons, Karel G. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
[6]   Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial [J].
Conaghan, Joe ;
Chen, Alice A. ;
Willman, Susan P. ;
Ivani, Kristen ;
Chenette, Philip E. ;
Boostanfar, Robert ;
Baker, Valerie L. ;
Adamson, G. David ;
Abusief, Mary E. ;
Gvakharia, Marina ;
Loewke, Kevin E. ;
Shen, Shehua .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (02) :412-+
[7]   Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality [J].
Cruz, Maria ;
Garrido, Nicolas ;
Herrero, Javier ;
Perez-Cano, Inmaculada ;
Munoz, Manuel ;
Meseguer, Marcos .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 25 (04) :371-381
[8]   Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation [J].
Dal Canto, Mariabeatrice ;
Coticchio, Giovanni ;
Renzini, Mario Mignini ;
De Ponti, Elena ;
Novara, Paola Vittoria ;
Brambillasca, Fausta ;
Comi, Ruggero ;
Fadini, Rubens .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 25 (05) :474-480
[9]   The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos [J].
Fisch, JD ;
Rodriguez, H ;
Ross, R ;
Overby, G ;
Sher, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (09) :1970-1975
[10]   Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 to predict blastocyst development potential: A prospective study based on 4042 embryos [J].
Guerif, F. ;
Le Gouge, A. ;
Giraudeau, B. ;
Poindron, J. ;
Bidault, R. ;
Gasnier, O. ;
Royere, D. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (07) :1973-1981