Geodynamics of very high speed transport systems

被引:30
作者
Connolly, D. P. [1 ]
Alves Costa, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Inst High Speed Rail & Syst Integrat, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Porto, Portugal
关键词
GROUND VIBRATIONS; HALF-SPACE; CRITICAL VELOCITY; DYNAMIC-BEHAVIOR; MOVING LOAD; RAILWAY; SURFACE; TRAINS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105982
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This work reveals the existence of a new dynamic load amplification mechanism due to ground surface loads. It is caused by the interaction between a moving vehicle's axle configuration and the vibration characteristics of the underlying soil-guideway system. It is more dominant than the traditionally considered 'critical velocity' dynamic amplification mechanism of the guideway-ground structure, and is of relevance to very high speed transport systems such as high speed rail. To demonstrate the new amplification mechanism, first a numerical model is developed, capable of simulating ground-wave propagation in the presence of a series of discrete high speed loads moving on a soil-guideway system. The model couples analytical equations for the transportation system guideway with the thin-layer element method for ground simulation. As a practical example, it is validated using high speed railroad field data and then used to analyse the response of a generalised single moving load at high speed. Next the effect of multiple discrete vehicle-guideway contact points is studied and it is shown that dynamic amplification is highly sensitive to load spacing when the speed is greater than the critical velocity. In particular, large resonant effects occur when the axle/magnet loading frequency and the propagating wave vibration frequency of the soil-guideway structure are equivalent. As an example, it is shown that for an individual case, although critical velocity might increase displacements by 50-100%, for the same scenario, axle configuration can increase displacements by 400%. It is also shown that resonance is sensitive to the total number of loading points and the individual frequencies excited by various spacings. The findings are important for current (e. g. high speed railway) and potential future (e.g. hyperloop) transport systems required to operate at speeds either close-to, or greater than the critical velocity of their supporting guideway-soil structure. In such situations, it is important to design the vehicle and supporting structure(s) as a combined system, rather than in isolation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Exploring Bridge Dynamics for Ultra-high-speed, Hyperloop, Trains [J].
Alexander, Nicholas A. ;
Kashani, Mohammad M. .
STRUCTURES, 2018, 14 :69-74
[2]   Track-ground vibrations induced by railway traffic: In-situ measurements and validation of a 2.5D FEM-BEM model [J].
Alves Costa, P. ;
Calcada, R. ;
Silva Cardoso, A. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 32 (01) :111-128
[3]   Numerical methods for analysis of structure and ground vibration from moving loads [J].
Andersen, L. ;
Nielsen, S. R. K. ;
Krenk, S. .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2007, 85 (1-2) :43-58
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Thesis
[5]  
[Anonymous], HYPERLOOP ALPHA WHIT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Geotechnical earthquake engineering
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Vibration of solids and structures under moving loads, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-9685-7
[8]   The influence of train properties on railway ground vibrations [J].
Colaco, Aires ;
Costa, Pedro Alves ;
Connolly, David P. .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2016, 12 (05) :517-534
[9]   Optimising low acoustic impedance back-fill material wave barrier dimensions to shield structures from ground borne high speed rail vibrations [J].
Connolly, D. ;
Giannopoulos, A. ;
Fan, W. ;
Woodward, P. K. ;
Forde, M. C. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2013, 44 :557-564
[10]   Influence of soil non-linearity on the dynamic response of high-speed railway tracks [J].
Costa, Pedro Alves ;
Calcada, Rui ;
Cardoso, Antonio Silva ;
Bodare, Anders .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2010, 30 (04) :221-235