A hybrid intelligent model for assessment of critical success factors in high-risk emergency system

被引:95
作者
Han, Yuzhen [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Yong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Inst Fundamental & Frontier Sci, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DEMATEL; Fuzzy cognitive map; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory; Critical success factors; High-risk emergency system; Multi-criteria decision making; FUZZY COGNITIVE MAPS; DECISION-MAKING MODEL; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; DEPENDENCE ASSESSMENT; SIMILARITY; LOGISTICS; STREAMS; UTILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s12652-018-0882-4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
High-risk emergency systems are emerging as a new generation technology to prevent disasters. Latest research points out that these systems could protect properties and lives in an efficient way. Limited to the sources, the feasible way to improve the performance of the system is to identify critical success factors (CSFs) and then optimize them. In this paper, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach integrating Affinity Diagram, Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (evidence theory) is proposed to identify critical success factors in high-risk emergency system. The DEMATEL and FCM are initially combined to tackle the decision-making problem in theory and practice. This model has ability to fuse technical, economic, political and social attributes. The proposed method is applied to select CSFs for Chongqing city.
引用
收藏
页码:1933 / 1953
页数:21
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   An FCM-FAHP approach for managing readiness-relevant activities for ERP implementation [J].
Ahmadi, Sadra ;
Yeh, Chung-Hsing ;
Papageorgiou, Elpiniki I. ;
Martin, Rodney .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 88 :501-517
[2]   Toward automated feature model configuration with optimizing non-functional requirements [J].
Asadi, Mohsen ;
Soltani, Samaneh ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Hatala, Marek ;
Bagheri, Ebrahim .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 56 (09) :1144-1165
[3]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[4]   Assessment of resilience engineering factors in high-risk environments by fuzzy cognitive maps: A petrochemical plant [J].
Azadeh, A. ;
Salehi, V. ;
Arvan, M. ;
Dolatkhah, M. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 68 :99-107
[5]   Leanness assessment and optimization by fuzzy cognitive map and multivariate analysis [J].
Azadeh, Ali ;
Zarrin, Mansour ;
Abdollahi, Mohammad ;
Noury, Saeid ;
Farahmand, Shabnam .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (15-16) :6050-6064
[6]   Development of a novel multiple-attribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Baykasoglu, Adil ;
Golcuk, Ilker .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 301 :75-98
[7]  
Belassi W., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P141, DOI DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00064-X
[8]   Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS [J].
Bian, Tian ;
Zheng, Haoyang ;
Yin, Likang ;
Deng, Yong .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (04) :501-515
[9]   Scenario planning for climate strategies development by integrating group Delphi, AHP and dynamic fuzzy cognitive maps [J].
Biloslavo, Roberto ;
Dolinsek, Slavko .
FORESIGHT, 2010, 12 (02) :38-48
[10]  
Bullen C., 1981, PRIMER CRITICAL SUCC