Assessing the true role of coauthors in the h-index measure of an author scientific impact

被引:14
作者
Ausloos, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KNAW, E Humanities Grp, NL-1096 CJ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] GRAPES, B-4031 Liege, Federation Wall, Belgium
关键词
Co-authorship; h-index; Principal component analysis; Scientific production; Fractional weight; JOURNAL LITERATURE; HIRSCH INDEX; GROWTH-MODEL; CO-AUTHORS; VARIANTS; COLLABORATION; MANIFESTATION; INDICATORS; REFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.004
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
A method based on the classical principal component analysis leads to demonstrate that the role of co-authors should give a h-index measure to a group leader higher than usually accepted. The method rather easily gives what is usually searched for, i.e. an estimate of the role (or "weight") of co-authors, as the additional value to an author papers' popularity. The construction of the co-authorship popularity, H-matrix is exemplified and the role of eigenvalues and the main eigenvector component are discussed. Examples illustrate the points and serve as the basis for suggesting a generally practical application of the concept. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 142
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of the number and rank of coauthors on h-index and π-index. The part-impact method
    Vinkler, Peter
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (04) : 2349 - 2369
  • [2] Impact of h-index on author's rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors
    Khurana, Parul
    Sharma, Kiran
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (08) : 4483 - 4498
  • [3] Assessing the Scientific Impact of Individual Scholars With Multi-Scale H-Index
    Ma, Feng
    Huang, Yuan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 226942 - 226951
  • [4] Drawbacks to h-index, as a factor assessing the scientific impact and the scientific credit of a researcher
    Rahimmi, Arman
    COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 14 (02) : 331 - 333
  • [5] The H-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher H-index than you do
    Benevenuto, Fabricio
    Laender, Alberto H. F.
    Alves, Bruno L.
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 106 (01) : 469 - 474
  • [6] The H-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher H-index than you do
    Fabrício Benevenuto
    Alberto H. F. Laender
    Bruno L. Alves
    Scientometrics, 2016, 106 : 469 - 474
  • [7] Predicting scientific impact based on h-index
    Ayaz, Samreen
    Masood, Nayyer
    Islam, Muhammad Arshad
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 114 (03) : 993 - 1010
  • [8] Measuring Scientific Impact With the h-Index: A Primer for Pathologists
    Schreiber, William E.
    Giustini, Dean M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 151 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [9] A Bayesian h-index: How to measure research impact
    Cerchiello, Paola
    Giudici, Paolo
    STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND DATA MINING, 2016, 9 (06) : 388 - 396
  • [10] H-index and research evaluation: A suggested set of components for developing a comprehensive author-level index
    Norouzi, Ali
    Parsaei-Mohammadi, Parastoo
    Zare-Farashbandi, Firoozeh
    Zare-Farashbandi, Elahe
    Geraei, Ehsan
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2024,