Eco-guilt in tourism: Do tourists intend to behave environmentally friendly and still revisit?

被引:44
作者
Bahja, Frida [1 ]
Hancer, Murat [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Rosen Coll Hospitality Management, Tourism Events & Attract Dept, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Rosen Coll Hospitality Management, Dept Hospitality Serv, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
(Eco)guilt; Environmentally-friendly tourism behaviors; Revisiting intentions; Environmental concerns; Environmental knowledge; SEM; DECISION-MAKING; MECHANICAL TURK; DATA-COLLECTION; GREEN HOTELS; APPEALS; KNOWLEDGE; CONSUMERS; IMPACT; EMOTIONS; LOYALTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100602
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although the role of (eco)guilt is relatively well-established in the literature on environmentally-friendly behaviors, little empirical research has been dedicated to this topic in tourism. Nevertheless, this topic has been gaining special interest in a spate of recent publications on tourists' (eco)guilt worldwide. A natural question arises: What is the influence of (eco)guilt in the context of environmentally-friendly tourism behavior (EFTB) and how does it effect tourists' revisiting intention? To answer this question, data were collected via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) through a convenience sampling method. The hypothesized relationships were analyzed with structural equation modeling (SEM). The results of this study provide empirical evidence that (eco)guilt's effect on EFTB is significant and positive. Altogether, environmental concerns, environmental knowledge, and (eco)guilt explain more than three-quarters of EFTB variance. Regarding the persistent assumption of (eco)guilt's negative impact on revisiting intention, the results show that this direct relationship is insignificant. Instead, the indirect effect of (eco)guilt reveals itself to be positive and significant through EFTB. Implications of this study in tourism literature are outlined, along with its insights for tourism managers and marketers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 187 条
[1]  
Abdullah S. I. N. W., 2019, Management Science Letters, V9, P1461, DOI [DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2019.5.005, 10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.005]
[2]   Experienced guilt, but not pride, mediates the effect of feedback on pro-environmental behavior [J].
Adams, Ian ;
Hurst, Kristin ;
Sintov, Nicole D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 71
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   The effect of environmental concern and scepticism on green purchase behaviour [J].
Albayrak, Tahir ;
Aksoy, Safak ;
Caber, Meltem .
MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2013, 31 (01) :27-+
[5]  
ANCHEZ YLO, 2016, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V17, P59
[6]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[7]   The persuasiveness of guilt appeals over time: Pathways to delayed compliance [J].
Antonetti, Paolo ;
Baines, Paul ;
Jain, Shailendra .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 90 :14-25
[8]   Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices [J].
Antonetti, Paolo ;
Maklan, Stan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 124 (01) :117-134
[9]  
Arcury T.A., 1987, J ENVIRON EDUC, V18, P31, DOI DOI 10.1080/00958964.1987.9942746
[10]   Nature-based tourism's impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a review and analysis of the literature and potential future research [J].
Ardoin, Nicole M. ;
Wheaton, Mele ;
Bowers, Alison W. ;
Hunt, Carter A. ;
Durham, William H. .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM, 2015, 23 (06) :838-858