Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning

被引:70
作者
Godwin-Jones, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
Automatic Corrective Feedback; Machine Translation; AI Tools; Second Language Writing; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; AUTOMATED FEEDBACK; TEACHER; ACCURACY; SLA;
D O I
10.10125/73474
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In recent years, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to significantly improved, or in some cases, completely new digital tools for writing. Systems for writing assessment and assistance based on automated writing evaluation (AWE) have been available for some time. That is the case for machine translation as well. More recent are synchronous feedback tools, such as Grammarly. That tool incorporates, as do others, predictive text technology, supplying automated sentence completion. Emerging writing assistance goes further, generating an entire text in response to a brief prompt. That capacity, along with significantly improved performance of both automated feedback systems and machine translation, is enabled through advances in AI, built on ever larger datasets and deep machine learning. While they differ in interface, functionality, and target audience, the available and emerging set of intelligent writing tools can be used to help learners improve the quality of their written texts. However, their use in instructional language learning has in some cases been controversial. In this column, we will be examining AI-enabled writing tools, reviewing the findings from research studies, and discussing their use in instructional settings. When integrated into writing instruction and practice, these digital tools have been found to offer significant benefits to both students and teachers. Teacher mediation aids learners in becoming informed consumers of language technology, as well as helping them to gain meta-linguistic knowledge. For researchers, intelligent writing tool use is optimally analyzed from a broad ecological perspective that examines the dynamic interplay of learner, software, and instructional environment.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 24
页数:20
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Foreign Languages and Higher Education: New Structures for a Changed World, DOI DOI 10.1632/PROF.2007.2007.1.234
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The New York Times
[3]   An Open for Replication Study: The Role of Feedback Timing in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication [J].
Arroyo, Diana C. ;
Yilmaz, Yucel .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2018, 68 (04) :942-972
[4]  
Bitchener J., 2012, Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing
[5]   Design and evaluation of automated writing evaluation models: Relationships with writing in naturalistic settings [J].
Bridgeman, Brent ;
Ramineni, Chaitanya .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2017, 34 :62-71
[6]   Informing Automated Writing Evaluation Using the Lens of Genre: Two Studies [J].
Burstein, Jill ;
Elliot, Norbert ;
Molloy, Hillary .
CALICO JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (01) :117-141
[7]   Writing Motivation in School: a Systematic Review of Empirical Research in the Early Twenty-First Century [J].
Camacho, Ana ;
Alves, Rui A. ;
Boscolo, Pietro .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 33 (01) :213-247
[8]   Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation [J].
Chapelle, Carol A. ;
Cotos, Elena ;
Lee, Jooyoung .
LANGUAGE TESTING, 2015, 32 (03) :385-405
[9]   Don't Wait Until it Is Too Late: The Effect of Timing of Automated Feedback on Revision in ESL Writing [J].
Conijn, Rianne ;
van Zaanen, Menno ;
van Waes, Luuk .
TRANSFORMING LEARNING WITH MEANINGFUL TECHNOLOGIES, EC-TEL 2019, 2019, 11722 :577-581
[10]  
Cotos E, 2014, GENRE-BASED AUTOMATED WRITING EVALUATION FOR L2 RESEARCH WRITING: FROM DESIGN TO EVALUATION AND ENHANCEMENT, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137333377