Patent Incentives, Technology Markets, and Public-Private Bio-Medical Innovation Networks in Brazil

被引：34
作者：
Ryan, Michael P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] George Washington Univ, Sch Law, Washington, DC 20052 USA
来源：
WORLD DEVELOPMENT | 2010年 / 38卷 / 08期
基金：
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词：
technology innovation; technology networks; patents; intellectual property rights; bio-medical technology; Brazil; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; IVORY TOWER; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE; PROTECTION; LITIGATION; ENCLOSURE; POLITICS; RETURNS; COMMONS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.013
中图分类号：
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号：
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要：
Contested is whether patent laws promote indigenous technology invention and innovation in developing countries. Brazil reformed its patent laws in 1996 to permit pharmaceutical product patents. Study of five post-patent law reform bio-medical technology invention and innovation projects in the state of Sao Paulo supports the propositions that patents provide incentives to Brazilian bio-medical technology entrepreneurs to make risky investments into innovation and that patents facilitate technology markets among public private technology innovation networks, both Brazilian collaborations and North South collaborations. Brazil enacted a technology law in 2005 that encourages public private technology innovation through patent incentives and patent-facilitated technology markets. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1082 / 1093
页数：12
相关论文
共 87 条
[21]   The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drugs - evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s [J].
Danzon, PM ;
Wang, YR ;
Wang, L .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (03) :269-292
[22]   PATENTS AND THE PROGRESS OF SCIENCE - EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS AND EXPERIMENTAL USE [J].
EISENBERG, RS .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 1989, 56 (03) :1017-1086
[23]   Public research and private development: Patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research [J].
Eisenberg, RS .
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1996, 82 (08) :1663-1727
[24]   PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND THE NORMS OF SCIENCE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH [J].
EISENBERG, RS .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1987, 97 (02) :177-231
[25]   The new commons vs. the second enclosure movement: Comments on an emerging agenda for development research [J].
Evans, P .
STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 40 (02) :85-94
[26]  
Fagerberg J., 2004, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO, P1, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199286805.001.0001]
[27]  
*FAPESP, 2005, TRANSL RES BUS 10 YE
[28]   Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities [J].
Feldman, M ;
Feller, I ;
Bercovitz, J ;
Burton, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) :105-121
[29]  
Fink C, 2005, TRADE DEV SER, P1
[30]   The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries [J].
Forero-Pineda, Clemente .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (06) :808-824
123456789