Effectiveness of the Heat-Activated Nitinol SMart Piston Stapes Prosthesis in Stapedectomy Surgery

被引:6
作者
Cho, John J. W. [1 ]
Yunker, Warren K. [1 ]
Marck, Paulette [2 ]
Marck, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Foothills Med Ctr, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Richmond Rd Diagnost & Treatment Ctr, Dept Audiol, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
otosclerosis; SMart piston prosthesis; stapedectomy; SHAPE-MEMORY; OTOSCLEROSIS; STAPEDOTOMY;
D O I
10.2310/7070.2010.090297
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the SMart piston stapes prosthesis to a standard manual crimp prosthesis on operative time and air-bone gap (ABG) closure in stapedectomy. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary referral centre. Methods: The charts of patients undergoing stapedectomy for otosclerosis were analyzed. We compared the results of 76 patients (80 ears) who received the autocrimping SMart piston prosthesis to those of 21 patients (21 ears) who received the conventional manual crimp Fisch-type prosthesis. Data were analyzed using t-test, chi-square, or two-way analysis of variance where appropriate. Main Outcome Measure: Operative time with ABG closure as a secondary outcome measure. Results: There was a significant difference in operative time between the Fisch-type prosthesis and the SMart piston prosthesis groups. The operation required 28.9 +/- 3.2 minutes when using the Fisch-type prosthesis, whereas 21.2 +/- 2.4 minutes were needed when using the SMart piston (p < .001). There was a significant improvement in postoperative ABG for both the Fisch-type piston (28.1 +/- 3.1 to 9.0 +/- 1.4, p < .001) and the SMart piston (25.1 +/- 3.7 to 8.2 +/- 2.5, p < .001) groups. Conclusions: Use of the SMart piston prosthesis results in ABG closure similar to that of the traditional Fisch-type prosthesis but offers the added advantage of reduced operative time.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The heat-activated stapes prosthesis 'Smart' piston - Technique and preliminary results [J].
Babighian, Gregorio ;
Fontana, Marco ;
Caltran, Silvia .
OTOSCLEROSIS AND STAPES SURGERY, 2007, 65 :190-196
[2]   Revision surgery for otosclerosis: Review of 73 cases [J].
Betsch, C ;
Ayache, D ;
Decat, M ;
Elbaz, P ;
Gersdorff, M .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 32 (01) :38-47
[3]   Hearing results after stapedotomy with a nitinol piston prosthesis [J].
Brown, Kevin D. ;
Gantz, BruceJ. .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2007, 133 (08) :758-762
[4]   Systemic allergic reaction to the percutaneous patent foramen ovale occluder [J].
Fukahara, K ;
Minami, K ;
Reiss, N ;
Fassbender, D ;
Koerfer, R .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 125 (01) :213-214
[5]  
Harris JP, 2007, OTOL NEUROTOL, V28, P692
[6]  
HOUSE HP, 1993, OTOLARYNG CLIN N AM, V26, P323
[7]   Stapes prosthesis attachment: The effect of crimping on sound transfer in otosclerosis surgery [J].
Huber, AM ;
Ma, FR ;
Felix, H ;
Linder, T .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2003, 113 (05) :853-858
[8]   Shape-memory stapes prosthesis for otosclerosis surgery [J].
Knox, GW ;
Reitan, H .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (08) :1340-1346
[9]  
Lesinski S George, 2003, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, V11, P347, DOI 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00007
[10]  
PERKINS RC, 1980, LARYNGOSCOPE, V90, P228