Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:43
|
作者
Wang, Yanhua [1 ]
Chen, Wei [3 ]
Zhang, Lijia [2 ]
Xiong, Chen [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Yu, Kai [4 ]
Ju, Jiabao [1 ]
Chen, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Zhang, Dianying [1 ]
Zhang, Yingze [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Peoples Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopead, 11 Xizhimen South St, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 139 Ziqiang Rd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Fifth Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Finite element analysis; InterTan; Intertrochanteric fracture; PFNA; Proximal femur bionic nail; SCREW; GAIT;
D O I
10.1111/os.13247
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare the biomechanical properties of proximal femur bionic nail (PFBN), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and InterTan in the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures AO/OTA 31-A1.3 by finite element analysis. Methods We used Mimics, Unigraphics and other software to establish normal femur and AO/OTA 31-A1.3 fracture models, and reconstructed PFBN, PFNA and InterTan intramedullary nail models, and assembled them on the fracture model. The ANSYS software was used to compare the femoral von Mises stress distribution, deformation distribution, and internal fixation stress distribution of each group under a load of 2100 N. Results It could be seen that the femoral maximum stress, femoral maximum displacement, and maximum stress of internal fixation of the PFBN group were lower than those in the PFNA group and the InterTan group. The maximum femoral stress of the PFBN was 190.25 MPa, while the maximum stress of the femur of the PFNA and InterTan groups were 238.41 Mpa and 226.97 Mpa. The maximum femoral displacement of each group were located at the top of the femoral head, and the maximum displacement of the PFBN group was 14.373 mm, and the maximum displacement values of the PFNA and InterTan groups were 19.49 and 15.225 mm. For the stress distribution of intramedullary nail, the maximum stress of the three kinds of internal fixation was located on the main nail. The maximum stress of PFBN was 1191.8 MPa, compared with 2142.8 MPa for PFNA and 1702.3 MPa for InterTan. And the maximum stress on the PFBN pressure nail was 345.35 MPa, compared with 868.6 MPa for the PFNA spiral blade and 545.5 MPa for InterTan interlocking twin nails. Conclusion Compared with PFNA and InterTan, PFBN has better mechanical properties. The biomechanical characteristics of PFBN are more advantageous than PFNA and InterTan internal fixation system in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:2245 / 2255
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Yanfeng Huang
    Chunlin Zhang
    Yi Luo
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 2465 - 2473
  • [2] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Huang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Chunlin
    Luo, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [3] Biomechanical evaluation of a new intramedullary nail compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTAN for the management of femoral intertrochanteric fractures
    Wang, Chaofeng
    Duan, Ning
    Li, Zhong
    Ma, Teng
    Zhang, Kun
    Wang, Qian
    Huang, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12
  • [4] A comparison of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral fail antirotation in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures
    Imerci, Ahmet
    Aydogan, Nevres H.
    Tosun, Kursad
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2018, 84 (02): : 123 - 131
  • [5] Proximal Femoral Nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: Functional and Radiological Outcome in Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
    Singh, Siddhartha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [6] Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus InterTan nail for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liao, Chang-sheng
    He, Fang-zheng
    Li, Xi-yong
    Han, Peng-fei
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [7] INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis
    Zhang, Hui
    Zeng, Xianshang
    Zhang, Nan
    Zeng, Dan
    Xu, Ping
    Zhang, Lili
    Chen, Deng
    Yu, Weiguang
    Zhang, Xinchao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (04) : 1297 - 1309
  • [8] Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN): A Panacea for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture
    Zhang, Kaixuan
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Yingze
    ENGINEERING, 2024, 37 : 152 - 158
  • [9] Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)-an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures
    Zhao, Haiyue
    Deng, Xiangtian
    Liu, Weijian
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Yiran
    Wang, Zhongzheng
    Wang, Yuchuan
    Lian, Xiaodong
    Hou, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (04) : 1089 - 1099
  • [10] Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)—an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures
    Haiyue Zhao
    Xiangtian Deng
    Weijian Liu
    Wei Chen
    Lei Wang
    Yiran Zhang
    Zhongzheng Wang
    Yuchuan Wang
    Xiaodong Lian
    Zhiyong Hou
    Qi Zhang
    Yingze Zhang
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 1089 - 1099